Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 1

I would like to add two different WS-Policy definitions to my SOAP-based Web service and I would like to give the service consumer the choice to comply to either policy. How can I do this? Select the correct answer.

ACreate a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.

BCreate the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.

CCommunicate each policy through a separate WS-Addressing SOAP header and let the service consumer choose which header to use.

DYou cannot do this.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Norah at Oct 26, 2022, 05:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shannon

7 months ago

I agree with B, it's the best approach for flexibility!

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

7 months ago

Definitely not D, that’s just wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

7 months ago

Wait, can you really group policies like that? Sounds too good to be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

8 months ago

I think A could work too, but B seems more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melinda

8 months ago

Option B is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

8 months ago

I’m pretty sure you can do this, so option D doesn’t make sense. I just can’t recall the exact details about how to implement it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

8 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different policies, and I think option C sounds interesting, but it seems more complicated than necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like creating separate XML schemas for each policy isn't the best approach. That makes me lean towards option B as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

8 months ago

I think I remember something about policy alternatives being used to give consumers a choice. Maybe option B is the right one?

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is understanding the purpose of replaying logfiles and how the GENEX Probe works in that context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

8 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

1 year ago

I heard you can also achieve this by creating two separate web services and flipping a coin to decide which one to call. Highly efficient, I know.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

1 year ago

B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?

upvoted 0 times

Louvenia

1 year ago

B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

1 year ago

B) Create the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

1 year ago

A) Create a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

1 year ago

D? Really? That's like saying I can't have two flavors of ice cream. Of course I can, and B is how I do it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestine

1 year ago

I was about to pick C, but then I realized that WS-Addressing headers are for a different purpose. B makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

Oren

12 months ago

User 3: B makes sense, let's go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, B seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

1 year ago

User 1: I think B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work if we attach both XML schemas to the WSDL definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheal

1 year ago

B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

Felix

1 year ago

Definitely. It's a good way to handle multiple policy options in a SOAP-based Web service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

1 year ago

That makes sense. It gives flexibility to the consumer while keeping the implementation clean.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

1 year ago

That makes sense. It's good to give the service consumer the flexibility to choose which policy to comply with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elroy

1 year ago

Yes, I agree. It allows the service consumer to choose which policy to comply with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

1 year ago

I think the answer is B. Grouping the policies in a policy alternative seems like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

1 year ago

B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamika

1 year ago

I agree with Leonida, option B makes sense because it allows for grouping the policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...