Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All S90.02 Questions]

I would like to add two different WS-Policy definitions to my SOAP-based Web service and I would like to give the service consumer the choice to comply to either policy. How can I do this? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Norah at Oct 26, 2022, 05:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shannon
5 months ago
I agree with B, it's the best approach for flexibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
6 months ago
Definitely not D, that’s just wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
6 months ago
Wait, can you really group policies like that? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
6 months ago
I think A could work too, but B seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
6 months ago
Option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
6 months ago
I’m pretty sure you can do this, so option D doesn’t make sense. I just can’t recall the exact details about how to implement it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different policies, and I think option C sounds interesting, but it seems more complicated than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like creating separate XML schemas for each policy isn't the best approach. That makes me lean towards option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
6 months ago
I think I remember something about policy alternatives being used to give consumers a choice. Maybe option B is the right one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is understanding the purpose of replaying logfiles and how the GENEX Probe works in that context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
7 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
11 months ago
I heard you can also achieve this by creating two separate web services and flipping a coin to decide which one to call. Highly efficient, I know.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
12 months ago
B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
11 months ago
B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
B) Create the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
11 months ago
A) Create a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
12 months ago
D? Really? That's like saying I can't have two flavors of ice cream. Of course I can, and B is how I do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
12 months ago
I was about to pick C, but then I realized that WS-Addressing headers are for a different purpose. B makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
Oren
10 months ago
User 3: B makes sense, let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, B seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
11 months ago
User 1: I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosio
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work if we attach both XML schemas to the WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
1 year ago
B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
11 months ago
Definitely. It's a good way to handle multiple policy options in a SOAP-based Web service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
That makes sense. It gives flexibility to the consumer while keeping the implementation clean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
11 months ago
That makes sense. It's good to give the service consumer the flexibility to choose which policy to comply with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. It allows the service consumer to choose which policy to comply with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I think the answer is B. Grouping the policies in a policy alternative seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
11 months ago
B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamika
1 year ago
I agree with Leonida, option B makes sense because it allows for grouping the policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel