Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education Exam S90.02 Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All S90.02 Questions]

I would like to add two different WS-Policy definitions to my SOAP-based Web service and I would like to give the service consumer the choice to comply to either policy. How can I do this? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Noelia
28 days ago
I heard you can also achieve this by creating two separate web services and flipping a coin to decide which one to call. Highly efficient, I know.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
30 days ago
B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
9 days ago
B is the way to go. Although I'm curious, can I also serve the policies with a side of fries?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
14 days ago
B) Create the two separate policies and group them in a policy alternative that is then associated with the service's WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
20 days ago
A) Create a separate XML schema for each policy and attach both XML schemas to the service's WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
1 months ago
D? Really? That's like saying I can't have two flavors of ice cream. Of course I can, and B is how I do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
1 months ago
I was about to pick C, but then I realized that WS-Addressing headers are for a different purpose. B makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
2 days ago
User 1: I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosio
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work if we attach both XML schemas to the WSDL definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
2 months ago
B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
5 days ago
Definitely. It's a good way to handle multiple policy options in a SOAP-based Web service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 days ago
That makes sense. It gives flexibility to the consumer while keeping the implementation clean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
16 days ago
That makes sense. It's good to give the service consumer the flexibility to choose which policy to comply with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
21 days ago
Yes, I agree. It allows the service consumer to choose which policy to comply with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
25 days ago
I think the answer is B. Grouping the policies in a policy alternative seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
28 days ago
B is the correct answer. Grouping the two policies in a policy alternative and associating it with the WSDL is the way to go. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamika
2 months ago
I agree with Leonida, option B makes sense because it allows for grouping the policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel