Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education S90.01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Which of the following is not a benefit of maintaining a vendor-neutral and business-driven context for a service-oriented architecture?
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
B) Avoid establishing a technology architecture that will need to be replaced in the near future when it no longer adequately fulfills business requirements.
C) Leverage new technological innovation in order to maximize the fulfillment of business requirements.
D) Establish a technology architecture that can stay in alignment with how the business may need to change over time.

Arcitura Education S90.01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.01 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 5
[All S90.01 Questions]

Which of the following is not a benefit of maintaining a vendor-neutral and business-driven context for a service-oriented architecture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Floyd
6 months ago
Not sure about C, innovation can be risky sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
6 months ago
B is spot on! We need to adapt, not stick to old tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
7 months ago
Wait, can we really avoid replacing tech? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
7 months ago
Totally agree, A just limits flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
7 months ago
A is definitely not a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
7 months ago
I vaguely recall that avoiding obsolescence is important, so B seems like a benefit too, but I can't quite remember how it relates to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question about aligning technology with business needs, and I feel like option D is definitely a benefit, but I'm unsure about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
8 months ago
I think option A sounds like the opposite of what we want in a service-oriented architecture. It seems like a limitation rather than a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
8 months ago
I remember discussing how a vendor-neutral approach allows for flexibility, but I'm not sure if that means we should have a fixed scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
8 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I understand the context and can identify the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
8 months ago
This question is testing our understanding of service-oriented architecture and its design principles. I'll need to draw on my knowledge of SOA to determine which option is not a benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to identify the option that doesn't align with the benefits of a vendor-neutral and business-driven approach. I'll carefully consider each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options, but I'll try to eliminate the ones that seem less relevant to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
8 months ago
This question is a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one is not a benefit of maintaining a vendor-neutral and business-driven context for a service-oriented architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 year ago
A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? Sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry. I'd rather be stuck in a room with a bunch of IT consultants, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
Ooh, I'm going with A. A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? Sounds like a sweet gig to me - no more software updates or maintenance headaches!
upvoted 0 times
Candra
12 months ago
User 3: I think I'll go with D. It's important to stay aligned with the business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
12 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It would be nice to have a fixed tech architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 year ago
User 1: I'm going with A too. Who needs all that hassle of updating technology?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonora
1 year ago
B and C seem like the obvious choices here. Who wants a tech architecture that's going to be outdated in no time? And leveraging new tech to meet business requirements is kind of the point.
upvoted 0 times
Roy
12 months ago
C) Leverage new technological innovation in order to maximize the fulfillment of business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 year ago
B) Avoid establishing a technology architecture that will need to be replaced in the near future when it no longer adequately fulfills business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 year ago
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer. A flexible, adaptable technology architecture is crucial to keep up with evolving business needs. That's the whole point of SOA, right?
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
12 months ago
Definitely, being able to leverage new technology to meet business requirements is a huge benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
12 months ago
Yeah, it's important to avoid getting stuck with outdated technology that no longer meets business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
1 year ago
I agree, having a technology architecture that can evolve with the business is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
1 year ago
A? Really? That's the complete opposite of what we want in a service-oriented architecture. A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? No way, that's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
1 year ago
C) Leverage new technological innovation in order to maximize the fulfillment of business requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to avoid replacing technology architecture frequently to save costs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel