MENU
Which of the following is not a benefit of maintaining a vendor-neutral and business-driven context for a service-oriented architecture?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium S90.01 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
FL
Floyd
11 months ago
Not sure about C, innovation can be risky sometimes.
CI
Ciara
11 months ago
B is spot on! We need to adapt, not stick to old tech.
RO
Rolland
11 months ago
Wait, can we really avoid replacing tech? Sounds too good to be true.
DE
Delisa
11 months ago
Totally agree, A just limits flexibility.
MA
Marilynn
12 months ago
A is definitely not a benefit.
GE
German
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that avoiding obsolescence is important, so B seems like a benefit too, but I can't quite remember how it relates to the question.
CO
Colette
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about aligning technology with business needs, and I feel like option D is definitely a benefit, but I'm unsure about A.
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
I think option A sounds like the opposite of what we want in a service-oriented architecture. It seems like a limitation rather than a benefit.
HA
Halina
1 year ago
I remember discussing how a vendor-neutral approach allows for flexibility, but I'm not sure if that means we should have a fixed scope.
DE
Desmond
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I understand the context and can identify the correct answer.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
This question is testing our understanding of service-oriented architecture and its design principles. I'll need to draw on my knowledge of SOA to determine which option is not a benefit.
DE
Desire
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to identify the option that doesn't align with the benefits of a vendor-neutral and business-driven approach. I'll carefully consider each choice.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options, but I'll try to eliminate the ones that seem less relevant to the question.
LU
Lucia
1 year ago
This question is a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one is not a benefit of maintaining a vendor-neutral and business-driven context for a service-oriented architecture.
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? Sounds about as exciting as watching paint dry. I'd rather be stuck in a room with a bunch of IT consultants, honestly.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
Ooh, I'm going with A. A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? Sounds like a sweet gig to me - no more software updates or maintenance headaches!
CA
Candra
1 year ago
User 3: I think I'll go with D. It's important to stay aligned with the business needs.
PE
Pedro
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It would be nice to have a fixed tech architecture.
NO
Noah
1 year ago
User 1: I'm going with A too. Who needs all that hassle of updating technology?
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
B and C seem like the obvious choices here. Who wants a tech architecture that's going to be outdated in no time? And leveraging new tech to meet business requirements is kind of the point.
RO
Roy
1 year ago
C) Leverage new technological innovation in order to maximize the fulfillment of business requirements.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
B) Avoid establishing a technology architecture that will need to be replaced in the near future when it no longer adequately fulfills business requirements.
JO
Josphine
1 year ago
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
I think D is the correct answer. A flexible, adaptable technology architecture is crucial to keep up with evolving business needs. That's the whole point of SOA, right?
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
Definitely, being able to leverage new technology to meet business requirements is a huge benefit.
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important to avoid getting stuck with outdated technology that no longer meets business needs.
WA
Wade
1 year ago
I agree, having a technology architecture that can evolve with the business is key.
TE
Teddy
2 years ago
A? Really? That's the complete opposite of what we want in a service-oriented architecture. A fixed, unchanging tech architecture? No way, that's a recipe for disaster!
CA
Caitlin
1 year ago
C) Leverage new technological innovation in order to maximize the fulfillment of business requirements.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
A) Establish a technology architecture with a fixed scope and purpose that remains unchanged, regardless of how the business may need to change over time.
MA
Margret
2 years ago
But wouldn't it be better to avoid replacing technology architecture frequently to save costs?
MI
Milly
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
MA
Margret
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.