Arcitura Education S90.01 Exam - Topic 3 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.01 exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 3

What is wrong with this statement: "We delivered two services last year. Even though each service was delivered by a separate project team in a different location and at a different time, I am confident that the services will be reasonably interoperable because each project team was asked to use the same design standards."

AThe statement is incorrect because services should never be delivered by different project teams.

BThe statement is incorrect because services rely on post-implementation integration effort in order to achieve interoperability, not design standards.

CThe statement is incorrect because SOA delivery projects require that services be created at exactly the same time in order to guarantee interoperability.

DThere is nothing wrong with this statement.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Theola at Sep 03, 2023, 08:02 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisha

3 months ago

I don't see a problem with the statement; design standards are key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

3 months ago

I think they need to focus on how the services will actually work together post-launch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luz

4 months ago

Wait, so they think just using the same design is enough? Really?

upvoted 0 times

...

Linsey

4 months ago

I agree, interoperability is more about integration than just design standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

4 months ago

Services can totally be delivered by different teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dong

4 months ago

I thought SOA projects required simultaneous delivery for interoperability, but I can't recall if that's strictly true. Could option C be the answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

4 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it emphasized that services need to be integrated post-delivery. That makes me lean towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the statement could be okay if the teams communicated well. Maybe option D is right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

5 months ago

I remember discussing how interoperability often depends on integration efforts after implementation, not just design standards. So, I think option B might be correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know there are a few different profiles that deal with traffic analytics, but I can't remember the exact names off the top of my head. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between "restarted" and "live migrated" in the answer choices. I'll need to think through those options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

5 months ago

Ah, this is a classic search head cluster issue. Based on the error, I'd say the "splunk apply shcluster-bundle" command from the deployer is the way to go. That should push the correct configuration bundle to the affected member.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is A. TCP/IP stack fingerprinting is a technique nmap uses to determine the remote operating system by analyzing the way the target system implements the TCP/IP protocol stack. This can be a useful way to gather information about a system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eulah

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward security question. I'll need to think about network segmentation and visibility to reduce threats on the surface.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheal

5 months ago

I think the right answer is to use route filtering to only advertise routes originated from the client's own AS. That way, the traffic will flow through ISP1 for full Internet connectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...