New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education C90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's C90.02 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 4
[All C90.02 Questions]

We exported data from our on-premise relational database to a cloud-based non-relational database. After the export, we noticed that the size of the cloud-based database was significantly larger than our on-premise database. What is the likely reason that the database size increased?

Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kristian
3 months ago
A seems unlikely to me. HTTP headers shouldn't make a huge difference in size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
3 months ago
I doubt C is a factor. State data doesn't usually add that much size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
3 months ago
Wait, isn't it possible that all of them contribute? D could be the answer too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
4 months ago
Totally agree with B! Non-relational databases usually denormalize data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
I think B is the right answer. Normalization vs. denormalization makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
4 months ago
I wonder if all of these factors combined could be the reason for the size increase. Option D sounds plausible, but I need to think more about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where denormalization was mentioned, and it seems like that could definitely lead to increased size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the additional metadata from the transmission could also play a role. Maybe option A is relevant too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
5 months ago
I remember discussing how normalization affects database size, so I think option B might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. The data was transmitted over a network, so the increase in size is probably due to additional metadata from the HTTP headers being stored in the non-relational database. I'll select option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
Hmm, I think I know the answer to this one. The non-relational database likely needs to store additional state data to support higher scalability, which would increase the overall database size. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it something to do with the normalization/denormalization of the data? Or maybe the cloud database needs to store additional metadata for scalability? I'll have to review my notes on database concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. The question mentions that the data was exported from a relational database to a non-relational database. That's a key clue - the data structure and storage format must have changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
5 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'll need to think through the key differences between relational and non-relational databases to figure out the likely reason for the size increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
5 months ago
The key is to focus on the core principles of API security, like authentication, authorization, and data protection. I think options A and C are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 year ago
I agree with both of you. The state data added for scalability in the cloud-based database could also contribute to the increase in size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
I believe it could also be because of the additional meta data accumulated during data transmission over the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 year ago
I think the increase in database size is due to the normalization of data from the relational database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Haha, all of the above? That's the easy way out! I bet the correct answer is more specific than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
I'm going with C. The cloud database needs to add extra state data to handle the scalability, which makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
1 year ago
C seems to be the most logical choice. The state data for synchronization would explain the increase in size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
1 year ago
Yeah, C sounds right. The extra state data for scalability is necessary for cloud databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 year ago
I agree, C makes the most sense. The state data for synchronization would definitely increase the size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
1 year ago
I think the answer is C. The cloud database needs to add extra state data for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
1 year ago
Hmm, I think it's option B. The normalization in the relational database probably got denormalized in the non-relational one, leading to the size increase.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
1 year ago
Yeah, that could explain the increase in size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
I think you're right, option B does make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel