New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education C90.02 Exam - Topic 5 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's C90.02 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 5
[All C90.02 Questions]

A cloud service can be hosted by a physical server or a virtual server. When using the failover system mechanism, the same cloud service cannot be hosted by more than one physical server.

Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Leota at Jul 12, 2024, 10:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Luis
3 months ago
Makes sense, but it seems limiting for high availability setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
3 months ago
Yep, only one physical server can host the service at a time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
Wait, really? I always thought you could have multiple physical servers for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
4 months ago
I disagree, I thought failover allowed for redundancy across servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
That's true, failover systems can't duplicate services on multiple servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
4 months ago
I recall that failover systems are designed for reliability, but I can't remember if they restrict hosting to just one server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did on redundancy; I feel like the answer might be false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about load balancing allowing multiple servers to host the same service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I think the statement is true because failover systems usually require a single active instance to avoid conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The question is clear that the same cloud service can't be hosted by more than one physical server when using the failover system. The answer has to be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the relationship between physical and virtual servers in the context of failover. I'll have to review that concept before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is saying that with the failover system, the same cloud service can only be hosted on one physical server at a time. So the answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The wording about physical and virtual servers is throwing me off. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. The question is asking about the failover system mechanism, so I think the key is understanding that the same cloud service can't be hosted by more than one physical server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward performance issue with the Lambda function. I'd start by looking at increasing the memory allocation to see if that helps with the CPU-intensive operations.Liam: Hmm, I'm not sure about the hyperthreading option. I'd need to do some more research on how that might impact the Lambda function's performance. Increasing the memory seems like a safer bet.Olivia: Turning off the AWS managed encryption doesn't seem like it would help with the performance issues. That's more of a security concern, not a performance one.Ethan: Loading the required code into a custom layer could be an interesting approach, but I'd want to make sure that doesn't introduce any other complications or overhead. Increasing the memory seems like the most straightforward solution to try first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
My gut says focusing on a smaller range of hyperparameters might lead to better results instead of trying to cover everything at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
5 months ago
Option C seems like the most logical choice to me. When using equity accounting, the group only includes its proportionate share of the investee's assets and liabilities, not 100% of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. The question is asking about the true statement, but the options seem to be interpreting the correlation coefficient rather than just stating the relationship. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
2 years ago
I see your point, Trinidad. So, the correct answer should be A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 years ago
But if the same cloud service is hosted by more than one physical server, it defeats the purpose of failover system, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
2 years ago
B) False. If the cloud service could only be hosted on one server, that would be a single point of failure, and we all know what happens when that goes down - chaos and mayhem! Gotta have that redundancy, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
2 years ago
B) False, obviously. If the cloud service could only be hosted on one physical server, that would defeat the whole purpose of having a failover system in the first place. Come on, people, think it through!
upvoted 0 times
Devora
2 years ago
B) False, obviously. If the cloud service could only be hosted on one physical server, that would defeat the whole purpose of having a failover system in the first place. Come on, people, think it through!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
2 years ago
I'm going to have to go with B) False on this one. Otherwise, what's the point of having a failover system if you can only use one server? Seems kind of counter-productive to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know about that. Doesn't failover mean that if one server goes down, the service automatically switches to another? Seems like B) False would be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
2 years ago
I agree, B) False seems to be the correct answer in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
2 years ago
Yes, that's my choice. What do you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
2 years ago
So, you would go with option B) False then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
2 years ago
I think you're right, failover is all about switching to another server when one goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Norah
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is B) False. The whole point of failover is to have redundancy, so the cloud service can be hosted on multiple physical servers.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. Failover ensures that if one physical server fails, the service can still be accessed from another server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
1 year ago
I agree, the correct answer is B) False. Failover allows for the cloud service to be hosted on multiple physical servers for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 year ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
1 year ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. The answer is B) False because failover allows for the cloud service to be hosted on multiple physical servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
2 years ago
I agree with you, the correct answer is B) False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel