Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Arcitura Education C90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 102 Discussion

Posted by Isadora on Nov 13, 2024 at 11:57 AM

A successful attack on a virtual server within a public cloud will negatively impact multiple cloud consumers, as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary that encompasses the underlying physical server.

Select the correct answer.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium C90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
JU
Julene 11 months ago
Are we sure about that? Seems like it could vary a lot.
EI
Eileen 11 months ago
Definitely true, shared resources can lead to shared risks.
AL
Alline 11 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize how interconnected these systems are!
SH
Shelia 11 months ago
I disagree, it depends on the isolation measures in place.
QU
Quentin 12 months ago
That's true, a breach can affect multiple users.
TR
Tran 12 months ago
I studied something similar where isolation was key. If the consumers are isolated, then maybe the attack wouldn't affect them all.
KE
Keshia 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards false. I feel like the attack could still have broader implications even if the trust boundaries are different.
GE
Genevive 1 year ago
I remember a practice question about shared resources in cloud environments. It seems like if they don't share a trust boundary, the impact might be limited.
RO
Rosalia 1 year ago
I think this might be true because if one virtual server is compromised, it could affect others, but I'm not sure about the trust boundaries part.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. The question is talking about trust boundaries and cloud consumers, which is not something I feel super confident about. I'll have to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
WH
Whitley 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is saying that a successful attack will negatively impact multiple cloud consumers, but only if they don't share the same trust boundary. So I guess the answer would be True.
MA
Marcelle 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. If the attack is on a virtual server in the public cloud, then it should impact multiple cloud consumers, as long as they don't share the same trust boundary. I'll go with True.
MA
Magda 1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think I need to focus on the key details about the trust boundary and cloud consumers.
MU
Murray 2 years ago
I'm going with False. Who needs trust boundaries when you have virtual duct tape and cloud-proof bubble wrap?
AR
Ardella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Murray
B) False
HY
Hyman 2 years ago
↳ replying to Murray
A) True
SE
Serina 2 years ago
True, definitely true. It's like a virtual game of 'Escape the Cloud Contagion.' No one wants to be Patient Zero!
DO
Donte 2 years ago
↳ replying to Serina
I disagree, a successful attack on a virtual server can have far-reaching consequences.
CA
Carmen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Serina
B) False
ST
Stevie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Serina
Absolutely, it's important to understand the potential impact of a virtual server attack.
OL
Olive 2 years ago
↳ replying to Serina
A) True
CA
Carol 2 years ago
But if the virtual server is compromised, it can affect multiple cloud consumers who don't share the same trust boundary. So, I think it's True.
AR
Arthur 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) False.
BE
Bernardo 2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll have to think about the trust boundary concept more. Can't be too careful with cloud security!
CA
Carol 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) True.
EL
Eladia 2 years ago
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
PH
Phil 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
A) True
JA
Jade 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
LO
Lorita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
B) False
AL
Alpha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
A) True
DY
Dylan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
CA
Cathrine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
B) False
ST
Stephane 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eladia
A) True
IS
Isaac 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is True. When a virtual server is compromised in the cloud, it can impact multiple tenants on that physical server.
RO
Rory 2 years ago
↳ replying to Isaac
Actually, the correct answer is True. The shared physical server can affect multiple tenants in the cloud.
DE
Desire 2 years ago
↳ replying to Isaac
B) False
KA
Katy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Isaac
That's correct. A successful attack on a virtual server in a public cloud can indeed impact multiple cloud consumers.
ST
Stephania 2 years ago
↳ replying to Isaac
A) True
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel