Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education C90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 102 Discussion

A successful attack on a virtual server within a public cloud will negatively impact multiple cloud consumers, as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary that encompasses the underlying physical server.Select the correct answer.
B) False
A) True

Arcitura Education C90.02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's C90.02 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 4
[All C90.02 Questions]

A successful attack on a virtual server within a public cloud will negatively impact multiple cloud consumers, as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary that encompasses the underlying physical server.

Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Isadora at Nov 13, 2024, 11:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julene
9 months ago
Are we sure about that? Seems like it could vary a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
9 months ago
Definitely true, shared resources can lead to shared risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
10 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize how interconnected these systems are!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
10 months ago
I disagree, it depends on the isolation measures in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
That's true, a breach can affect multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
10 months ago
I studied something similar where isolation was key. If the consumers are isolated, then maybe the attack wouldn't affect them all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards false. I feel like the attack could still have broader implications even if the trust boundaries are different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
11 months ago
I remember a practice question about shared resources in cloud environments. It seems like if they don't share a trust boundary, the impact might be limited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
11 months ago
I think this might be true because if one virtual server is compromised, it could affect others, but I'm not sure about the trust boundaries part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
11 months ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. The question is talking about trust boundaries and cloud consumers, which is not something I feel super confident about. I'll have to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is saying that a successful attack will negatively impact multiple cloud consumers, but only if they don't share the same trust boundary. So I guess the answer would be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. If the attack is on a virtual server in the public cloud, then it should impact multiple cloud consumers, as long as they don't share the same trust boundary. I'll go with True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think I need to focus on the key details about the trust boundary and cloud consumers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
2 years ago
I'm going with False. Who needs trust boundaries when you have virtual duct tape and cloud-proof bubble wrap?
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serina
2 years ago
True, definitely true. It's like a virtual game of 'Escape the Cloud Contagion.' No one wants to be Patient Zero!
upvoted 0 times
Donte
2 years ago
I disagree, a successful attack on a virtual server can have far-reaching consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 years ago
Absolutely, it's important to understand the potential impact of a virtual server attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carol
2 years ago
But if the virtual server is compromised, it can affect multiple cloud consumers who don't share the same trust boundary. So, I think it's True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll have to think about the trust boundary concept more. Can't be too careful with cloud security!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
2 years ago
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
2 years ago
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
2 years ago
False! The question says 'as long as none of the cloud consumers share the same trust boundary.' That means if they are on different servers, they should be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaac
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is True. When a virtual server is compromised in the cloud, it can impact multiple tenants on that physical server.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
2 years ago
Actually, the correct answer is True. The shared physical server can affect multiple tenants in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
2 years ago
That's correct. A successful attack on a virtual server in a public cloud can indeed impact multiple cloud consumers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel