Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Appian Exam ACD200 Topic 9 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 9
[All ACD200 Questions]

Which review format is the most efficient way to coach team members and improve code quality? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ernest at Oct 18, 2023, 09:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Aracelis
25 days ago
Peer Dev Review is the way to go, but I'd also recommend a few beers to make it more fun. Code reviews and happy hours, that's the recipe for success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
27 days ago
User Acceptance Testing? Really? That's like trying to fix a car by kicking the tires.
upvoted 0 times
Brett
1 days ago
C) Retrospectives
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
18 days ago
B) Automated Code Scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
19 days ago
A) Peer Dev Review
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
1 months ago
Automated Code Scanning is the most efficient option. It can catch issues early and save us a lot of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
7 days ago
User Acceptance Testing is crucial for ensuring the code meets the requirements of the end users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
15 days ago
Retrospectives can be helpful for reflecting on the process and making improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
16 days ago
I agree, Peer Dev Review is also important for getting feedback from team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
26 days ago
Automated Code Scanning is definitely the way to go. It helps catch issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
I'm a big fan of Retrospectives. They give us a chance to reflect on what went well and what we can improve for the next sprint.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
16 days ago
I prefer Peer Dev Review because it allows for direct feedback from team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
20 days ago
Retrospectives are great for reflecting on our work and making improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
2 months ago
I believe Retrospectives are crucial for improving code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Peer Dev Review is definitely the way to go! It's a great way to get direct feedback from team members and improve the code together.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
3 hours ago
A) Peer Dev Review
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
3 days ago
Retrospectives are good for reflecting on the process, but Peer Dev Review is more hands-on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
5 days ago
C) Retrospectives
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
15 days ago
Automated Code Scanning can also be helpful for catching certain types of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
22 days ago
B) Automated Code Scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
27 days ago
I agree, Peer Dev Review allows for direct feedback and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 months ago
A) Peer Dev Review
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
I prefer Automated Code Scanning for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
2 months ago
I think Peer Dev Review is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel