Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian Exam Appian Certified Senior Developer Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's Appian Certified Senior Developer exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions]

You are designing a case management application. The initiator creates a case, and the reviewer reviews it approximately 7 days later.

You have already designed a process model for the initiators to create the case.

Which process model design will result in the lowest memory impact? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cheryll
3 months ago
Ha! I bet the memory impact of Option A would be like trying to fit a rhinoceros into a sardine can. Gotta go with something more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
1 months ago
I think Option D might be a better choice for lower memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
1 months ago
I agree, we should go with a more efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
Option A sounds like it would take up a lot of memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C with the Start Process node sounds like it might be overkill for this use case. Let's see what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
Cruz
26 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option A is the best choice for minimizing memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
27 days ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Assigning a task to the reviewer directly could streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
28 days ago
I agree, option A seems like it would have the lowest memory impact since the case record is only accessed when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
29 days ago
I think option A makes the most sense. It keeps the case record separate until the reviewer is ready to review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option A is the best choice to minimize memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Assigning a task to the reviewer directly could streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most efficient choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense. It keeps things simple and doesn't add unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nida
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Using a Sub-Process node allows for better modularity and scalability, which could be important for a case management application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
3 months ago
Option B seems like the most efficient choice. By assigning a task directly to the reviewer, the memory impact should be lower compared to initializing a separate process model.
upvoted 0 times
Joanne
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, assigning a task directly to the reviewer seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
3 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dino
3 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more efficient in terms of memory usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice because it separates the review process model for the reviewer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
4 months ago
I think option A will result in the lowest memory impact.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel