Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

You need to insert the deleted row of a table into a history table for audit purposes.What is the most efficient method to achieve this?
B) Process model and C) View
A) Materialized view
D) Trigger

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All ACD200 Questions]

You need to insert the deleted row of a table into a history table for audit purposes.

What is the most efficient method to achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

by Taryn at Feb 06, 2023, 03:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Twana
8 months ago
Surprised this isn't more straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
8 months ago
A process model could work, but triggers are more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
8 months ago
Wait, can a materialized view even do that? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
9 months ago
Definitely agree, triggers automate the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
9 months ago
I think a trigger is the best way to handle this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
9 months ago
I feel like a process model could work too, but it seems more complex than just using a trigger for this specific case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think using a trigger would allow for real-time auditing, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about materialized views being more for performance rather than auditing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
9 months ago
I think a trigger might be the best option here since it can automatically log the deleted row without needing extra steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
9 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'd start by identifying the key objects involved in a Salesforce CPQ migration, like Quote, Order, and Assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all sound like they could be part of the IFRS development process. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between these two costing systems. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand which one is more detailed and which one is easier to administer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different subnet notations in the options. Let me double-check my understanding of CIDR and subnet masks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 year ago
I was about to suggest a view, but then I realized that's just a transparent window to the data, not a way to actually store the history. Trigger is the clear winner here. Unless, of course, you want to add some spice and go with a process model. You know, really make things complicated.
upvoted 0 times
Ulysses
1 year ago
Process model might be too complicated for just inserting a deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
1 year ago
Materialized view won't work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I agree, Trigger will allow you to automatically insert the deleted row into the history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
1 year ago
I think Trigger is the best option for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 year ago
Trigger it is then, thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 year ago
Yeah, Trigger would definitely be the way to go for inserting the deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
I agree, Trigger would be the most efficient method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 year ago
I think Trigger is the best option for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shelba
1 year ago
A trigger is definitely the way to go here. It's like a ninja in the shadows, silently recording every row that gets deleted. Efficient and stealthy, my kind of solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
India
1 year ago
A materialized view? Really? That seems a bit overkill for just keeping a history of deleted rows. I'd go with the good old trigger approach.
upvoted 0 times
Miesha
1 year ago
I think a trigger is the way to go as well. It's a simple and effective solution for auditing purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
1 year ago
I agree, a trigger would be the most efficient method for inserting the deleted row into a history table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mike
1 year ago
Hmm, I think a trigger would be the most efficient way to handle this. Automatically inserting the deleted row into a history table seems like a pretty straightforward use case for a trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 year ago
I personally think a Materialized view could also be a good option for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
1 year ago
I agree with Filiberto, using a Trigger would be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
I think the most efficient method would be using a Trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel