New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD101 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All ACD101 Questions]

You are using a local variable in an expression rule to describe the height of an applicant.

Which statement correctly describes the application of Appian best practices for naming your local variable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The best practice for naming variables in Appian is to use clear and descriptive names that convey the purpose or content of the variable. Therefore, local!applicantHeight is the best option as it precisely describes the value contained by the variable, which is the height of an applicant. This naming convention aids in readability and maintainability of the code, making it easier for developers to understand and modify the code in the future. Reference: Appian Best Practices - Expression Writing and Naming Conventions


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Callie
3 months ago
Definitely going with B, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
3 months ago
Wait, local!x? That’s a bit too vague, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
3 months ago
C just seems confusing, why not be specific?
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
A is way too abbreviated, not a fan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
4 months ago
I think B is the best choice, it’s clear and descriptive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option C. Using 'local!x' seems too vague, but I guess it could work in some contexts? I’m not sure if it’s best practice though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
4 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in our practice tests. If I recall correctly, option B was highlighted as the best practice for naming conventions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like using abbreviations like in option A could lead to confusion later on. We should aim for descriptive names, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of clear variable names in our last study session. I think option B makes the most sense for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
5 months ago
I think the best approach here is to use the most descriptive variable name possible, which would be option B. "local!applicantHeight" clearly communicates the purpose of the variable, which is important for maintainability and understanding the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
5 months ago
Option A seems like it might be the right answer - "local!hoaa" to abbreviate "Height of an Applicant". That would follow the convention of minimizing typing and code length. But I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Appian has specific naming conventions, but I can't quite remember the details. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is option B - "local!applicantHeight". Appian best practices recommend using descriptive variable names that clearly communicate the purpose of the variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
1 year ago
I think option C is also a valid choice, as it follows a common naming convention for variables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
But using abbreviations can make the code less readable for other developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 year ago
Appian devs who use 'local!x' must also prefer their variable names to be as mysterious as their codebase. Just sayin'.
upvoted 0 times
Ora
1 year ago
Yeah, I prefer shorter variable names to save time when coding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
1 year ago
A) local!hoaa - This employs the naming convention of abbreviating 'Height of an applicant' to minimize typing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
1 year ago
I always use descriptive variable names to make my code more readable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 year ago
B) local!applicantHeight - This employs the naming convention of specifically describing the value contained by the variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olene
1 year ago
I'm with Dallas on this one. 'local!x' is the coding equivalent of shrugging your shoulders. Let's be better than that.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
1 year ago
B) local!applicantHeight - This employs the naming convention of specifically describing the value contained by the variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
1 year ago
A) local!hoaa - This employs the naming convention of abbreviating 'Height of an applicant' to minimize both the typing required by developers and the length of code Appian is required to parse.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more efficient in terms of typing and code length.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice because it clearly describes the variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 years ago
Using 'local!x' just feels lazy. Might as well call it 'local!whatevs' while we're at it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
2 years ago
Definitely 'local!applicantHeight'. Keeping variable names explicit and meaningful is a no-brainer for Appian best practices.
upvoted 0 times
Chantay
1 year ago
'local!x' might be confusing for future developers, 'local!applicantHeight' is much clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I think 'local!hoaa' is too vague, we should stick with 'local!applicantHeight'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 year ago
I agree, 'local!applicantHeight' is definitely the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilbert
2 years ago
Hmm, 'local!hoaa' seems a bit too cryptic. I prefer 'local!applicantHeight' - it's clear and descriptive.
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
1 year ago
Yeah, 'local!hoaa' is too cryptic, 'local!applicantHeight' is much better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
1 year ago
I prefer 'local!applicantHeight' as well, it's easier to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
1 year ago
I agree, 'local!applicantHeight' is clear and descriptive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
2 years ago
I think 'local!applicantHeight' is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel