Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Posted by Leota on May 01, 2026 at 04:44 PM

You need to remove an unused field from an existing record type Product, which has data sync enabled and is backed by a database table.

What should you do?

Suggested Answer: B

In Appian, when dealing with a record type that has data sync enabled and is backed by a database table, changes to the structure of the underlying data model, such as removing a field, should be carefully managed. The correct approach involves deleting the unused field from the Custom Data Type (CDT) that defines the structure of the data for the record type. Following this change, a full resynchronization of the record type is necessary to ensure that the changes in the CDT are reflected in the record type and its associated data in Appian. This process ensures data integrity and consistency across the application and the database. Reference:

Appian Documentation on Data Management: Provides guidelines on managing data structures, including CDTs and record types, within Appian applications.


Get Premium ACD101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
KA
Kallie 2 days ago
C could lead to data loss.
AN
Andra 7 days ago
But A might cause issues later.
MA
Margery 12 days ago
A seems easier though.
AL
Aliza 17 days ago
It ensures data integrity.
RO
Rodolfo 23 days ago
Why B?
AL
Aliza 28 days ago
I think option B is the best.
AN
Andra 1 month ago
This question is tricky.
RO
Rosendo 1 month ago
I agree, but C is more thorough.
DO
Donte 1 month ago
Option B is safer for data integrity.
KA
Kate 2 months ago
I feel like option A is too simple.
MO
Moon 2 months ago
True, but it might complicate things.
RO
Rosendo 2 months ago
I prefer option C. Clean up the database first.
DO
Donte 2 months ago
Option B makes sense. Full resync ensures everything's updated.
KA
Kate 2 months ago
But what if the database still has that column?
MO
Moon 2 months ago
I think option A is the easiest. Just delete the field.
JI
Jina 3 months ago
Totally agree with A, less hassle that way!
VI
Vincenza 3 months ago
Wait, can you really just delete it without issues?
AN
Angelica 3 months ago
C seems risky, what if it breaks something?
RO
Rozella 3 months ago
I think B is better for keeping things clean.
KA
Karol 3 months ago
Option A is the simplest way to go.
JE
Jerrod 4 months ago
I thought we could just delete the field from the record type and that would be enough, but now I'm second-guessing if we need to touch the database at all.
LI
Lindsey 5 months ago
I feel like option B makes the most sense since it mentions the CDT, but I can't recall if we need to worry about the database table too.
LU
Lucy 5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to consider the database column as well. Deleting it directly could cause issues, right?
LA
Lavonna 5 months ago
I think we might need to perform a full resync after deleting the field, but I'm not sure if it has to be done from the CDT or the record type itself.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel