Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

You write an expression that checks the validity of an email address.Which three scenarios should you configure as test cases? (Choose three.)
A) An invalid email address that is missing the @-character: 'john.doeexample.com'. and B) An invalid email address: null. and C) A valid email address: 'jane.doe@example.com'.
D) The mail server is unavailable.

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD101 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All ACD101 Questions]

You write an expression that checks the validity of an email address.

Which three scenarios should you configure as test cases? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

When testing the validity of an email address in Appian, you should consider various scenarios to ensure robust validation. This includes checking for the presence of the @-character, which is essential for a valid email format (A), testing how the expression handles null values (B), and verifying that a correctly formatted email address is validated as such (C). The availability of the mail server (D) is not relevant to the format validation of an email address within an expression. Reference: Appian Documentation - Expression Language Syntax


by Bobbye at Mar 04, 2024, 08:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawna
9 months ago
Not sure if null is a good test case, seems too basic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
9 months ago
Wait, can an email be valid if the server is down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
9 months ago
A valid email like 'jane.doe@example.com' is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
10 months ago
I think null should be included too, makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
Definitely need to test for missing the @-character!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
10 months ago
I think option D about the mail server might be relevant too, but I’m not sure if it fits the criteria for checking email validity directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
10 months ago
I definitely recall that we need to include a valid email address in our tests, so option C is definitely one to pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option B being null; I think we might have covered that in class, but it feels a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
11 months ago
I remember we discussed testing for missing components in email addresses, so option A seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
11 months ago
I've got this! I'll set up test cases for an invalid email without the '@', a null email, and a valid email address. Covering those bases should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'll definitely want to test an email missing the '@' symbol. Null values and unavailable mail servers are also good edge cases to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think carefully about the different scenarios that could invalidate an email address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'll focus on testing common invalid email formats and a valid email address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
11 months ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. The error message clearly states the memory is growing beyond parameters, so the answer must be that the QlikView Server memory is above the High limit for the Working Set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
11 months ago
Based on my understanding of CloudWatch, the correct answer is B, FreeStorageSpace. That's the metric I would check to ensure the DB Instance has enough free storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The key is to configure the profiler to use "No CoA" instead of the default behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I feel like I studied something about CoA settings impacting reauthentication. Is it possible that's the reason for the limited access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 years ago
I think we should not test for scenario D, as it is not related to email address validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
We should also test for scenario C, a valid email address to make sure our expression works correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
2 years ago
I agree with testing for scenario A. That's a common mistake people make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
2 years ago
I think we should test for scenario A, an invalid email address without the @-character.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
2 years ago
I think we should exclude testing for scenarios like the mail server being unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 years ago
We should also test for valid email addresses, like 'jane.doe@example.com'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
I agree with that. That's definitely an important test case to include.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
2 years ago
I think we should test for invalid email addresses without the @-character.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel