New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD101 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All ACD101 Questions]

You are configuring a local variable on an interface to store the date and time that the username field was last modified. The local variables are currently configured as follows:

Which a!refreshVariable configuration should be added so that local!usernameLastModified stores the correct timestamp?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The a!refreshVariable function should be configured to refresh when the local!username variable changes. This is achieved by setting the refreshOnVarChange parameter to local!username, which will update the local!usernameLastModified variable with the current timestamp whenever local!username is modified. Reference:

Appian Documentation: a!refreshVariable Function


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vernice
3 months ago
Definitely going with B, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
3 months ago
Wait, does refreshAlways really work like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
A refreshInterval of 0? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
4 months ago
I think C is better, always refreshing sounds safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
Option B seems right, it updates on username changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought refreshInterval was important, but I can't recall how it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about refreshing on variable change, so I'm leaning towards option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option C could work too since it says to refresh always.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
5 months ago
I think I remember that we need to refresh the variable when the username changes, so maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to double-check the details of how the refreshVariable configuration works to make sure I'm selecting the right option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that Option B is the correct answer. Refreshing the timestamp variable whenever the username changes seems like the logical way to keep it up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to refresh the local!usernameLastModified variable whenever the local!username variable changes. Option B looks like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the local variable setup here. I'll need to think through how the refreshVariable configuration should work to update the timestamp correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and the options to figure out the right configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Bottom-up planning looks at the granular details, so the answer has to be C - adding up all the individual costs of planned tasks and projects. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The company contributed $250,000 in cash, plus $140,000 to health and human-service organizations, of which $80,000 was from employee payroll deductions. So the total charitable contributions expense should be $310,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to review the phases of the SSAA process to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. Cloud services definitely use HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE to interact with REST APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old question of when to refresh a variable. I say we go with the sassy option C, 'refreshAlways: true'. That way, we can keep our users on their toes, wondering when the timestamp will change next!
upvoted 0 times
Darell
1 year ago
I'm with User2, let's keep it sassy with refreshAlways!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 years ago
I disagree, I prefer option C) refreshAlways: true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
2 years ago
I think we should go with option A) refreshInterval: 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherman
2 years ago
I think refreshInterval: 0 would be the best option to update the timestamp immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
Wait, wait, wait... why would we want to refresh the variable every single time? Wouldn't that be a bit overkill? I reckon option B is the way to go - it'll only update the timestamp when the username actually changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
Hey, that's not a bad idea! Keeping 'em guessing, eh? Although, I do worry it might drive our users a little crazy. Maybe we should just stick with the sensible option B and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
Destiny
1 year ago
Malcolm: Sounds good to me. Option B it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
1 year ago
Agreed, let's stick with option B and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 years ago
Yeah, that sounds like the most sensible choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 years ago
I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
2 years ago
But wouldn't refreshAlways: true ensure that the timestamp is always up to date?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe refreshOnVarChange: local!username is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 years ago
I think the correct configuration should be refreshAlways: true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
2 years ago
Okay, so we need to configure the refreshVariable to store the timestamp of when the username field was last modified. I think option B is the correct answer here, since it will refresh the local!usernameLastModified variable whenever the local!username variable changes.
upvoted 0 times
Gaston
2 years ago
Definitely, using refreshOnVarChange with local!username ensures that local!usernameLastModified stays up to date with any changes to the username field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
2 years ago
I think option B is the most efficient way to keep track of when the username field was last modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 years ago
Yes, that makes sense. It's important to have the timestamp updated whenever the username field is modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice to ensure local!usernameLastModified is updated when local!username changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel