New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation Exam - Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 5
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation Questions]

Which action is an organization required to take to ensure that personnel are competent to perform their assigned tasks within the ISMS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Clause 7.2 (Competence) requires the organization to:

''determine the necessary competence of person(s) doing work under its control that affects its information security performance;''

''ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience;''

''retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.''

This makes holding up-to-date records on training, skills, experience, and qualifications (D) the correct answer. Option A is irrelevant to competence. Option B is incorrect since ISO does not require Foundation-level training --- competence is context-based. Option C is related to compliance but does not ensure individual competence.

Thus, the verified correct answer is D.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kati
2 months ago
Totally agree with D, you can't manage what you don't measure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
Wait, are we really required to train everyone to that level? Seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
3 months ago
Definitely D, keeping records is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
3 months ago
I think B is important too, but not the only factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
3 months ago
A is interesting, but it doesn't directly address personnel competence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
I feel like A is a bit off-topic, but I can’t recall if it’s actually relevant to personnel competence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
3 months ago
I’m torn between C and D. I know compliance is crucial, but keeping records seems more directly related to ensuring competence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
4 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the importance of training, so I’m leaning towards B, but it feels too simplistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
4 months ago
I think the answer might be D, but I'm not entirely sure if just having records is enough to ensure competence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
4 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. It's not about improving the ISMS or ensuring compliance, but specifically about demonstrating personnel competence. Option D covers that requirement nicely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
4 months ago
This is straightforward - the organization needs to maintain up-to-date records on the training, skills, experience, and qualifications of its personnel to ensure they are competent. Option D is the clear answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Are we looking for general ISMS improvement, compliance, or specific personnel competence requirements? I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is ensuring personnel have the necessary training, skills, and qualifications to perform their assigned ISMS tasks. Option D looks like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the requirements for personnel competence in an ISMS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel