New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam - Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 4
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

Using the Scenario, answer the following questions about the Management Case section of the Full Business Case for

the Pittville project.

Decide whether the entry is appropriate for the document identified and select the responses that support your decision.

Remember to select 2 answers to each question.

The Programme and Project Management Framework section states:

1. The Programme Director is to be responsible for the Western Area Learning Improvements Programme.

2. Project progress reports are to be provided to the Consortium at the end of each month.

Which 2 statements apply to these entries?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

by Nieves at Jun 20, 2024, 05:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shaquana
3 months ago
Is it really okay for the Programme Director to handle everything alone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
Entry 2 should definitely stay; it makes sense for reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
3 months ago
Wait, why would the Consortium need to be accountable? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
4 months ago
Totally agree, no need to change it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 months ago
I think entry 1 is fine as is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
4 months ago
I recall that project reporting should definitely be in the Project Plan, but I’m not sure if that means we should remove entry 2 entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether the Consortium should be involved in entry 1. I thought the Programme Director had the final say.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
4 months ago
I think we had a similar question about project reporting in our practice exam. I feel like entry 2 might need to stay as is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
5 months ago
I remember discussing the roles of Programme Directors in our last class, but I'm not entirely sure if they should be accountable alone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
5 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. I'll just need to make sure I understand the program and project management framework before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
No problem, I've got a good strategy here. I'll analyze each entry against the requirements and select the responses that best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do we need to select two answers for each entry, or just two answers total?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to determine if the entries are appropriate for the Management Case section.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the framework details and think through the appropriate reporting structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident I can identify the two correct functions from the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know antitussives are for cough, but I'm not totally sure if that's the only option that would be used for a cough. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
The going-concern vs liquidation angle in option B sounds interesting. I'd spend extra time carefully reading that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
I thought we might need a policy services node combined with an admin node, like in option B. It seems logical for policy management, but does it really cover failover?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
2 years ago
I think we should remove entry 2 and document project reporting in the Project Plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
2 years ago
I believe no change is needed for entry 1. It seems appropriate to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 years ago
I agree with Shasta. The Programme Director shouldn't be solely responsible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
2 years ago
I think we should amend entry 1 because the Consortium should be jointly accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 years ago
No changes to entry 2 make sense. The project framework should include reporting arrangements in relation to the programme. It's all about that sweet, sweet communication, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
2 years ago
Absolutely, communication is key in any project. It's important to have clear reporting structures in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
2 years ago
No change to entry 2, because the project framework should include project reporting arrangements in relation to the programme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
2 years ago
Haha, entry 2 should definitely be removed. Project reporting arrangements belong in the Project Plan, not the Programme Framework. Someone's been watching too many episodes of 'The Office'!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 years ago
I agree with amending entry 1. The Senior Responsible Owner should not be the Programme Director, that's not appropriate. C'mon, that's just basic governance!
upvoted 0 times
Gertude
2 years ago
B) Amend entry 1, because the Senior Responsible Owner should NOT be the Programme Director.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
2 years ago
A) Amend entry 1, because the Western Area Learning Consortium should be jointly accountable for the Programme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kelvin
2 years ago
I think entry 1 should be amended because the Western Area Learning Consortium should be jointly accountable for the Programme. The Programme Director shouldn't be solely responsible.
upvoted 0 times
Josue
2 years ago
I agree, the Consortium should share responsibility for the Programme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
2 years ago
B) Amend entry 1, because the Senior Responsible Owner should NOT be the Programme Director.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
2 years ago
A) Amend entry 1, because the Western Area Learning Consortium should be jointly accountable for the Programme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel