New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam - Topic 3 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 3
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

The Consortium has stated that within the next three years, it expects to see at least a 15% increase in the attainment of

qualifications. However, it has not proposed ways in which the success rates for qualifications can be increased.

Is this approach appropriate for defining the spending objectives in the Strategic Outline Case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Naomi at Aug 04, 2025, 09:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tayna
2 months ago
I think it's fine to set targets, they can figure out the rest later!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
Wait, are they really not proposing any solutions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
3 months ago
But how can they promise that without a plan?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
3 months ago
Totally agree, they need a clear strategy first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
3 months ago
15% increase in qualifications sounds ambitious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
3 months ago
I lean towards option D because it emphasizes focusing on outcomes rather than just inputs. The Strategic Case should clarify what needs to be achieved, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
I feel like option C could be valid since the Consortium's role is to transform education, but I'm not convinced they should set targets without a clear plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 months ago
I remember a similar question about setting objectives without clear outcomes. I think option A makes sense because we can't just aim for a target without knowing how to get there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the Consortium needs to outline specific strategies to achieve that 15% increase. Without a plan, how can we measure success?
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option D is the right answer here. The Strategic Case should focus on the outcomes and outputs, not the details of the potential solution. The Consortium doesn't need to have a full plan in place to set a reasonable target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
I think the Consortium's approach is appropriate. The Strategic Case should be about defining the goals, not necessarily the specific plan to get there. As long as the 15% target is realistic and justified, that seems like a valid approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. On the one hand, the Consortium should probably have a proposed solution to reach the 15% target. But on the other hand, the Strategic Case is meant to focus on the outcomes, not the inputs. I'm not sure which way to go on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like the Consortium is setting a target without a clear plan to achieve it. I'm not sure if that's appropriate for the Strategic Outline Case.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
5 months ago
I agree with Rodney, without a solution, it's hard to measure success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
I think the Strategic Case should focus on the outcomes, not the potential solutions. If they can identify the right targets, the details can come later.
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
2 months ago
Outcomes guide the strategy, not the other way around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
2 months ago
But shouldn't they have a plan for improvement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
2 months ago
Exactly! Targets first, then solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
3 months ago
I agree, focusing on outcomes is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karima
6 months ago
Hold on, the Consortium is responsible for transforming education and learning. Shouldn't they be the ones setting the targets, even if they don't have all the solutions yet?
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
5 months ago
A) No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodney
7 months ago
I disagree, we need a solution to calculate improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
7 months ago
I think the approach is appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
7 months ago
Well, if the Consortium can't even propose ways to increase the success rates, how are they supposed to define the spending objectives? This is just setting everyone up for failure.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
5 months ago
B) No, because the Consortium should NOT be specifying the targeted outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
5 months ago
A) No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel