Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APMG-International Exam Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

It is estimated that 60% of the taxation costs on the development will NOT be reclaimable.

Should the unclaimable taxation costs be excluded from the Financial Appraisal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rikki at Mar 19, 2025, 06:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Linette
4 months ago
I'm going to go with B. Trying to exclude taxation costs would be like trying to file your taxes without including your income - it just doesn't add up!
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
3 months ago
B) No, because both resource and non-resource costs and benefits should be factored into the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
3 months ago
A) No, because the Financial Appraisal should demonstrate value for money.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
4 months ago
Haha, this question is a real tax-ifying conundrum! I'm going with B, because the Financial Appraisal needs to have a complete financial picture, even if it's not all sunshine and rainbows.
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
2 months ago
User 4: Definitely, we can't ignore important factors like taxation costs in the Financial Appraisal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
2 months ago
User 3: I think excluding taxation costs would give a skewed perspective on the project's viability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's important to have a comprehensive view of the financial impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, we need to consider all costs and benefits in the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
4 months ago
I agree with Miss. Excluding unclaimable taxation costs would provide a more accurate representation of the project's financial viability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C might be right, since taxation costs are typically excluded from the Financial Appraisal. But I guess B makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. The Financial Appraisal should factor in all costs and benefits, including taxation costs, to get an accurate picture of value for money.
upvoted 0 times
Jospeh
4 months ago
C) Yes, because taxation costs should be excluded from the Financial Appraisal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
4 months ago
B) No, because both resource and non-resource costs and benefits should be factored into the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
4 months ago
A) No, because the Financial Appraisal should demonstrate value for money.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miss
4 months ago
I see your point, but I believe the Economic Case should focus on inflation and taxation costs separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
4 months ago
But wouldn't that skew the results? Shouldn't we consider all costs and benefits in the analysis?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
4 months ago
I think we should exclude the unclaimable taxation costs from the Financial Appraisal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel