Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APMG-International Exam Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for APMG-International's Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Questions]

The Consortium has stated that within the next three years, it expects to see at least a 15% increase in the attainment of

qualifications. However, it has not proposed ways in which the success rates for qualifications can be increased.

Is this approach appropriate for defining the spending objectives in the Strategic Outline Case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gary
1 months ago
This question is making my head spin more than a Rubik's Cube! I wish the Consortium would just give us a simple, straightforward answer instead of these mind-bending riddles.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
8 days ago
D) Yes, because the Strategic Case should focus on what needs to be achieved in terms of the targeted outcomes and outputs rather than input in relation to the potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
15 days ago
This question is definitely tricky, but we need to consider all aspects before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
19 days ago
A) No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Providencia
1 months ago
D seems like the right answer to me. The Strategic Case should focus on the desired results, not the specific means to get there. Leave the details to the implementation phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 months ago
I'm going with C on this one. The Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education, so they should have a say in the targeted outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
2 days ago
D) Yes, because the Strategic Case should focus on what needs to be achieved in terms of the targeted outcomes and outputs rather than input in relation to the potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
10 days ago
A) No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
29 days ago
C) Yes, because the Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlene
1 months ago
I agree with B. The Consortium shouldn't be the one specifying the targeted outcomes. That's the job of the education authorities and stakeholders, not an external body.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I agree. Without a solution, it's hard to calculate potential improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
2 months ago
I think it's not appropriate because they haven't proposed ways to increase success rates for qualifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
Do you think the Consortium's approach is appropriate for defining spending objectives in the Strategic Outline Case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
2 months ago
This question is tricky, but I think the answer is A. Without a proposed solution, it's impossible to calculate the potential improvements. The Consortium should have at least outlined some ideas before setting a target.
upvoted 0 times
Yong
7 days ago
C) Yes, because the Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
15 days ago
A) I agree, it's important to have a plan in place before setting targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
24 days ago
B) No, because the Consortium should NOT be specifying the targeted outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 months ago
A) No, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel