Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APM-PFQ Exam - Topic 7 Question 2 Discussion

What is the main reason for an initial high-level review of a change request?
A) To consider if the change is feasible to evaluate at this stage.
B) To establish who might be the best stakeholders to be involved in the change.
C) To ensure that the change request is considered as soon as possible.
D) To implement the necessary actions to ensure the change has a smooth implementation.

APM-PFQ Exam - Topic 7 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for APM's APM-PFQ exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 7
[All APM-PFQ Questions]

What is the main reason for an initial high-level review of a change request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Jaime at May 22, 2024, 10:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium APM-PFQ Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Latricia
7 months ago
Surprised that people aren't leaning towards option C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
8 months ago
Really? I didn't think feasibility was the main focus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
8 months ago
I thought it was more about involving stakeholders, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
8 months ago
Totally agree, option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
8 months ago
It's all about feasibility at this stage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about D; it seems more about implementation rather than the review stage itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
9 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense too, since getting things moving quickly is often emphasized in project management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
9 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of identifying stakeholders in class, so option B sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
9 months ago
I think the initial review is mainly about feasibility, so I might lean towards option A. But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
9 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll first consider the purpose of a high-level review - it's likely to assess feasibility, stakeholders, or timing, rather than implementation details. Then I'll match that to the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
9 months ago
Okay, the key here is to identify the main reason for the high-level review, not necessarily all the potential benefits. I think I can eliminate a few of these options and then focus on the most likely main reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really focus on understanding the nuances between them to pick the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the purpose of a high-level review of a change request. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the key reasons for this type of review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
9 months ago
I think the route table would be the best place to find a list of paths to network nodes. That's where the routing information is stored, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
9 months ago
I think CBWFQ is definitely one of the options since it deals with bandwidth management. Not too sure about the second one, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
9 months ago
Ah, I remember this from the training! The correct answer is D, "tmsh /util bigpipe reset-factory-defaults". That's the command to reset an LTM device to its default settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
10 months ago
I think the divisional structure might be the best choice since the business has distinct product lines like soup and baby food. It allows more focus, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
2 years ago
A high-level review? More like a high-stakes game of 'guess the right answer'!
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
2 years ago
C) To ensure that the change request is considered as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 years ago
B) To establish who might be the best stakeholders to be involved in the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 years ago
A) To consider if the change is feasible to evaluate at this stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zena
2 years ago
This question is making my head spin! I bet the person who wrote it has way too much free time on their hands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 years ago
D, all the way! Smooth implementation is key. Gotta have a plan in place to make it happen seamlessly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
2 years ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, though. Gotta make sure the change is considered ASAP, before it's too late!
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
2 years ago
C) To ensure that the change request is considered as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 years ago
A) To consider if the change is feasible to evaluate at this stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
2 years ago
B) To establish who might be the best stakeholders to be involved in the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theresia
2 years ago
B seems like the best choice to me. Gotta get the right people on board from the start, or the whole thing could fall apart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. Gotta make sure it's feasible before diving in, you know? No point wasting time on something that won't work.
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
2 years ago
Definitely, feasibility is key before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 years ago
Definitely, we need to make sure it's doable before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
2 years ago
I agree, option A is important to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
2 years ago
I agree, option A is important to consider feasibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
2 years ago
Definitely, it's important to assess that before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
2 years ago
I agree, we need to check if the change is feasible first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel