Analyzing supplier relationships seems a bit off for value stream mapping. I lean towards identifying non-value-added activities as the best fit, but I could be wrong.
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about planning kaizen events. That might be where value stream mapping shines too.
I think value stream mapping is really useful for identifying non-value-added activities, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only benefit it provides.
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is understanding the difference between programmes and projects. The answer is likely related to the need for programmes to be flexible and adapt to changes in the organization's strategy.
Martina
6 months agoKirby
6 months agoMaira
6 months agoValda
7 months agoBobbye
7 months agoJesse
7 months agoShawna
7 months agoChaya
7 months agoLaurel
7 months agoRichelle
7 months agoNida
7 months agoMaybelle
7 months agoMalcolm
7 months agoRickie
7 months agoSueann
12 months agoLigia
11 months agoVivan
11 months agoFelice
11 months agoDortha
11 months agoStefania
12 months agoCraig
10 months agoJaime
11 months agoNilsa
11 months agoEveline
1 year agoJamal
11 months agoAngella
11 months agoLorrie
11 months agoRory
11 months agoChrista
11 months agoAileen
11 months agoAndra
11 months agoMicaela
1 year agoRene
1 year agoFrancene
1 year agoSkye
1 year agoCarmen
1 year agoMyra
1 year agoMiesha
1 year agoCasie
1 year ago