Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

A firm is assessing the risk of business disruption due to several types of natural disasters. When determining the risk of each type of disaster, the firm should consider the probability of each type of disaster and the:
C) firm's capability to mitigate the risk.
A) consequences of the disruption.
B) cost of mitigating the disaster.
D) forecaster's confidence in the risk probability.

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CSCP exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 5
[All CSCP Questions]

A firm is assessing the risk of business disruption due to several types of natural disasters. When determining the risk of each type of disaster, the firm should consider the probability of each type of disaster and the:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Norah at Dec 27, 2022, 08:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cammy
10 months ago
Probability and consequences go hand in hand, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
Wait, does anyone really trust forecasters' confidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
Agreed, but what about the firm's capability to handle it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
10 months ago
I think the cost of mitigating the disaster is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
10 months ago
Definitely need to consider the consequences of the disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought we were supposed to focus on the cost of mitigation, but now I’m questioning if the consequences are more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because understanding the consequences seems crucial, but I could see how the probability and the forecaster's confidence might also matter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
11 months ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the cost of mitigating disasters, but I feel like the firm's capability to mitigate the risk might also play a big role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
11 months ago
I think the consequences of the disruption are really important to consider, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know flow connectors have something to do with the flow logic, but I can't remember the exact details. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
11 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about the pre-configured indexes in Splunk. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about what the best practices are for using JavaScript libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel