Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 54 Discussion

A company has applied lean thinking and tools to its internal operations over the last several years. The company is now concerned about its ability to recover from a supply disruption. Which of the following actions would be most appropriate for the company to take to increase its resiliency?
C) Required the suppliers of key components to maintain safely stock
A) Arrange for multiple sources for key components.
B) Maintain 1 week's supply f safety stock for key components.
D) Add capacity to enable quick recovery from a disruption

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CSCP exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 5
[All CSCP Questions]

A company has applied lean thinking and tools to its internal operations over the last several years. The company is now concerned about its ability to recover from a supply disruption. Which of the following actions would be most appropriate for the company to take to increase its resiliency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jani at Jun 25, 2022, 06:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gennie
10 months ago
I think having multiple sources is the best way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
10 months ago
Really? Can we trust suppliers to keep safety stock?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
10 months ago
Adding capacity sounds like a solid plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
10 months ago
I disagree, safety stock is more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
10 months ago
Multiple sources for key components is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
11 months ago
Adding capacity for quick recovery sounds smart, but I wonder if option D is too reactive. We might need a mix of strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
11 months ago
I think requiring suppliers to hold safety stock, like in option C, could be a good strategy, but it might not be enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like maintaining safety stock could help too. Option B might be a good backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having multiple suppliers to mitigate risks, so I think option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with CyberArk EPM, so I'll need to think this through carefully. Let me re-read the question and options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
11 months ago
I think the Content Split activity would be the best choice for multivariate content testing in Journey Builder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The scenario covers a lot of ground - Ace Space's operations, their data practices, and the new privacy officer's concerns. I think I need to really focus on identifying the key factors that would establish the company's privacy baseline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
11 months ago
Certificate authorities are an interesting approach, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient way to handle this scenario. I'll need to consider the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
11 months ago
This seems like a classic risk management question. I'll apply the concepts we've covered in class to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
11 months ago
I think the default action is to allow when a new category is created, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel