New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CSCP exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 2
[All CSCP Questions]

Which of the following sustainability tools is most appropriate for managing environmental compliance with regulatory requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leota at Aug 09, 2023, 03:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leontine
3 months ago
Not sure if that's the best choice, what about the UN Global Compact?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
3 months ago
Totally agree, ISO 14000 is the standard we need!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
4 months ago
Wait, isn't ISO 26000 more about social responsibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
4 months ago
I think GRI is more about reporting than compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
4 months ago
Definitely ISO 14000 for compliance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
4 months ago
The UN Global Compact seems more about broader principles, so I’m leaning towards ISO 14000 too, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
4 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think ISO 26000 is more about social responsibility, not just environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember the GRI is more about sustainability reporting than compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
5 months ago
I think ISO 14000 is the right choice since it focuses specifically on environmental management systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Based on my understanding, "pure" mortality protection refers to insurance that provides coverage solely for the risk of death, without any additional features. I believe the correct answer is A, life insurance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
5 months ago
I think the answer is C - estimating a normalized level of economic earnings. The excess earnings method is used to determine the value of intangible assets, so it makes sense that it would be used to estimate a normalized level of earnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different financial information, but I'm not sure which one specifically relates to the summary of significant accounting policies. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
9 months ago
ISO 14000 - the 'environmental ISO' standard. Sounds like a perfect fit to me, unless you're feeling a bit 'UN-compliant' today.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
8 months ago
C) ISO 26000
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
8 months ago
B) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
9 months ago
A) ISO 14000
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephane
10 months ago
The United Nations Global Compact is a good framework, but it's more broad and not as targeted as ISO 14000 for managing environmental regulations.
upvoted 0 times
Vesta
8 months ago
ISO 26000 focuses more on social responsibility, so it may not be as targeted for environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
8 months ago
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is also important for transparency in sustainability reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
9 months ago
I agree, ISO 14000 provides a specific framework for meeting regulatory requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
9 months ago
ISO 14000 is definitely the most appropriate for managing environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
9 months ago
True, GRI can help with transparency and accountability in environmental practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
9 months ago
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is also a good tool for sustainability reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
9 months ago
I agree, ISO 14000 provides a more specific focus on environmental regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
9 months ago
ISO 14000 is definitely the way to go for managing environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
10 months ago
ISO 26000 is about social responsibility, not environmental compliance. Definitely not the right tool for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 months ago
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) seems more focused on reporting and disclosures rather than actual management of compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Junita
10 months ago
C) ISO 26000 also includes social responsibility aspects in addition to environmental management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
10 months ago
A) ISO 14000 is specifically designed for managing environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adaline
11 months ago
I personally prefer the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) because it provides a framework for reporting on sustainability performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
11 months ago
I agree with Mica, ISO 14000 focuses specifically on environmental management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
11 months ago
I think ISO 14000 is the way to go here. It's specifically designed for environmental management and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
9 months ago
GRI is more about reporting sustainability performance, ISO 14000 is better for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
9 months ago
What about Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
10 months ago
I agree, ISO 14000 is focused on environmental management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
10 months ago
ISO 14000 is a great choice for managing environmental compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mica
11 months ago
I think the most appropriate tool is ISO 14000.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel