Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Posted by Annelle on Mar 30, 2023 at 02:40 AM

Which of the following techniques require close coordination between product and process design?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CH
Christoper 11 months ago
A is the best fit here, it’s all about integration!
PA
Paris 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure VOC needs close coordination? Seems a bit off.
NO
Nohemi 12 months ago
A is the right choice, no doubt about it!
SA
Salena 12 months ago
I think B is more accurate, sequential engineering doesn’t need as much coordination.
GL
Glory 12 months ago
Definitely A, concurrent engineering is all about that teamwork!
DE
Dell 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards concurrent engineering too, but I wonder if priority planning could also involve some level of coordination.
TH
Thora 1 year ago
I feel like voice of the customer could play a role, but it seems more about gathering feedback than direct coordination.
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think sequential engineering might not require as much coordination.
FR
Francine 1 year ago
I think concurrent engineering is the one that really emphasizes coordination between product and process design, but I'm not entirely sure.
JA
Jackie 1 year ago
Okay, let's see - Provider Contract, Subtransaction, and Contract Account seem like the key fields here. I'll mark those.
MO
Moira 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one is the "best" reason. I'll have to read through them closely and try to determine the most important or compelling justification.
MI
Michal 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the main advantage of statistical sampling, and that's the ability to scientifically plan the sample size. That's what option D is talking about, so that's my pick.
BA
Barbra 1 year ago
Concurrent engineering, because who needs sequential when you can do it all at once and hope for the best?
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
D) Voice of the customer (VOC)
ZE
Zena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
C) Priority planning
RO
Rolande 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
B) Sequential engineering
KA
Kasandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barbra
A) Concurrent engineering
LA
Larue 1 year ago
Definitely A) Concurrent engineering. It's the engineering equivalent of speed dating, but with better results.
RO
Roosevelt 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A) Concurrent engineering. It's like a well-choreographed dance between the product and process designers.
KR
Kristine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roosevelt
D) Voice of the customer (VOC) is important, but it's not as directly related to coordination between product and process design.
TA
Tawanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roosevelt
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't have the same level of collaboration.
IV
Ivory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roosevelt
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination.
MA
Makeda 1 year ago
I'm going with A) Concurrent engineering. It just makes sense to have those teams collaborate closely.
QU
Queen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
D) Voice of the customer is crucial, but it's concurrent engineering that really brings product and process design together.
BE
Bernardo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
C) Priority planning is important, but nothing beats the teamwork of concurrent engineering.
FR
Fredric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't cut it when you need that collaboration between teams.
IR
Irene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination between product and process design.
JE
Jesusa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
D) Voice of the customer is crucial, but it's best heard through concurrent engineering.
RY
Ryan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
C) Priority planning is important, but nothing beats the teamwork in concurrent engineering.
TA
Tandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't cut it when you need that collaboration.
TI
Tien 1 year ago
↳ replying to Makeda
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination.
BE
Bernardo 2 years ago
Concurrent engineering, for sure! That's where the magic happens when product and process design work hand-in-hand.
GE
German 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bernardo
Yes, understanding the voice of the customer is also crucial for successful product and process design.
EU
Eun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bernardo
D) Voice of the customer (VOC)
LU
Lucia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bernardo
Absolutely, concurrent engineering is key for close coordination between product and process design.
IV
Ivette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bernardo
A) Concurrent engineering
MA
Margo 2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe it's D) Voice of the customer (VOC) because it involves gathering customer feedback for product design.
CY
Cyndy 2 years ago
I agree with Caprice. Concurrent engineering involves simultaneous product and process design.
CA
Caprice 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Concurrent engineering.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel