New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CSCP exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All CSCP Questions]

Which of the following techniques require close coordination between product and process design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Annelle at Mar 30, 2023, 02:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Christoper
4 months ago
A is the best fit here, it’s all about integration!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure VOC needs close coordination? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
4 months ago
A is the right choice, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
I think B is more accurate, sequential engineering doesn’t need as much coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
Definitely A, concurrent engineering is all about that teamwork!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards concurrent engineering too, but I wonder if priority planning could also involve some level of coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
5 months ago
I feel like voice of the customer could play a role, but it seems more about gathering feedback than direct coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think sequential engineering might not require as much coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
I think concurrent engineering is the one that really emphasizes coordination between product and process design, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see - Provider Contract, Subtransaction, and Contract Account seem like the key fields here. I'll mark those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one is the "best" reason. I'll have to read through them closely and try to determine the most important or compelling justification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the main advantage of statistical sampling, and that's the ability to scientifically plan the sample size. That's what option D is talking about, so that's my pick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
9 months ago
Concurrent engineering, because who needs sequential when you can do it all at once and hope for the best?
upvoted 0 times
Avery
8 months ago
D) Voice of the customer (VOC)
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
8 months ago
C) Priority planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
8 months ago
B) Sequential engineering
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
8 months ago
A) Concurrent engineering
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larue
10 months ago
Definitely A) Concurrent engineering. It's the engineering equivalent of speed dating, but with better results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A) Concurrent engineering. It's like a well-choreographed dance between the product and process designers.
upvoted 0 times
Kristine
8 months ago
D) Voice of the customer (VOC) is important, but it's not as directly related to coordination between product and process design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
8 months ago
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't have the same level of collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
9 months ago
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Makeda
10 months ago
I'm going with A) Concurrent engineering. It just makes sense to have those teams collaborate closely.
upvoted 0 times
Queen
8 months ago
D) Voice of the customer is crucial, but it's concurrent engineering that really brings product and process design together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
8 months ago
C) Priority planning is important, but nothing beats the teamwork of concurrent engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
8 months ago
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't cut it when you need that collaboration between teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
8 months ago
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination between product and process design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
9 months ago
D) Voice of the customer is crucial, but it's best heard through concurrent engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
C) Priority planning is important, but nothing beats the teamwork in concurrent engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
9 months ago
B) Sequential engineering just doesn't cut it when you need that collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
10 months ago
A) Concurrent engineering is definitely the way to go for close coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardo
11 months ago
Concurrent engineering, for sure! That's where the magic happens when product and process design work hand-in-hand.
upvoted 0 times
German
9 months ago
Yes, understanding the voice of the customer is also crucial for successful product and process design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
9 months ago
D) Voice of the customer (VOC)
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
10 months ago
Absolutely, concurrent engineering is key for close coordination between product and process design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
A) Concurrent engineering
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margo
11 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe it's D) Voice of the customer (VOC) because it involves gathering customer feedback for product design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
11 months ago
I agree with Caprice. Concurrent engineering involves simultaneous product and process design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Concurrent engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel