MENU
A company recently implemented a new supplier rating system. Data was collected from the enterprise resources planning system about each vendor's rating for cost, quality, and delivery over 12 months. A cutoff point was established for poor performers. The responsible purchasing agent then scheduled meetings with each supplier. Which of the following actions is most appropriate to take with suppliers whose ratings were below the cutoff point?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CSCP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
9 comments · newest first
HA
Harrison
11 months ago
Wait, are we really putting suppliers on probation? That seems risky!
BR
Brandon
12 months ago
D is definitely necessary to understand the issues better.
RO
Rosenda
12 months ago
C seems extreme, we should work on solutions first.
CA
Casey
12 months ago
I disagree, B is too harsh without giving them a chance.
FE
Felicia
1 year ago
A sounds like a good approach to improve relationships.
EV
Eva
1 year ago
Hmm, the question mentions that the Lambda logs show no errors or failures, so I'm not sure the frontend logs will be helpful. I think I'll focus on the Lambda side and create a dead-letter queue to see if there are any failed function invocations that I can troubleshoot.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I thought groups were related to EC2 instances, not IAM. I'll have to review my notes on IAM before answering this one.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of some of these options. I'll need to read them carefully and make sure I understand the differences between them before selecting the correct ones.
CO
Corazon
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option D, “All of the above.†It feels like all of those could be used to misappropriate assets, but I’d need to double-check.