Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CSCP Exam - Topic 2 Question 131 Discussion

Posted by Hildred on Aug 15, 2026 at 07:50 AM

A company most likely would consider moving a portion of its manufacturing to a second location to:

Suggested Answer: D

A company would consider moving a portion of its manufacturing to a second location to minimize the impact of natural disasters. This strategy, known as geographical diversification, helps ensure continuity of operations by spreading risk across different locations. If one site is affected by a natural disaster, the other location can continue to operate, thus minimizing downtime and ensuring a steady supply to customers.

Improving competitive advantage through cost control is more associated with outsourcing or offshoring to lower-cost regions.

Avoiding manufacturing downtime due to material shortages typically involves supply chain optimization rather than relocating manufacturing.

Maximizing security for customer shipments pertains to logistics and transportation security measures, not manufacturing location.


Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). 'Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation.'

Sheffi, Y. (2005). 'The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage.'

Get Premium CSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
BU
Bulah 3 days ago
D is important. Natural disasters can disrupt everything.
VA
Van 8 days ago
I agree, but B makes sense too. Material shortages can really hurt production.
RA
Ranee 13 days ago
I think A is the best choice. Cost control is crucial.
DI
Dino 18 days ago
Wait, moving for material shortages? Really?
ST
Stephane 23 days ago
I disagree, C) isn't a strong reason at all.
CL
Clay 28 days ago
D) Natural disasters can really mess things up!
LI
Lilli 1 month ago
B) but isn't that a bit risky?
ST
Stephaine 1 month ago
A) makes total sense for cost control.
TO
Tora 1 month ago
I’m leaning towards A as well, but I wonder if maximizing security for shipments is something companies consider more often than we think.
JO
Joni 2 months ago
I feel like D could be relevant since natural disasters can really disrupt operations, but I’m not confident it’s the primary reason.
DE
Delmy 2 months ago
I remember a similar question about supply chain risks, and I think avoiding downtime could be a factor too, so maybe B is a good choice.
CH
Charisse 2 months ago
I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure if cost control is the main reason for moving manufacturing.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel