Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM Exam - Topic 2 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 2
[All CPIM Questions]

End-of-line inspection often fails to improve quality for which of the following reasons?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by William at Dec 07, 2024, 10:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Launa
5 months ago
Really? I thought end-of-line checks were supposed to help!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
5 months ago
Totally agree with D, costs can be crazy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
6 months ago
Wait, how can C even be a reason?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
6 months ago
I think B is more relevant though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
6 months ago
A is definitely a big issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the costs aspect. I remember something about significant costs, but I’m not sure if that directly relates to quality improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
7 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about accountability. So, B seems like a strong contender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
7 months ago
I think I read that extensive personnel requirements could lead to inefficiencies, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason for failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
7 months ago
I remember discussing how end-of-line inspections can sometimes miss defects that occur earlier in the process. So, maybe B is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
7 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the details of end-of-line inspection, so I'll need to rely on my general knowledge of quality control principles. Gotta be careful not to overthink it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. End-of-line inspection can fail if it's too resource-intensive, lacks accountability, or doesn't involve quality circles. The costs are also a potential factor. I'll weigh each of those against the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know end-of-line inspection is important, but I'm not sure what the common reasons are for it failing to improve quality. I'll have to carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about quality control. I'll need to think through the key factors that can impact the effectiveness of end-of-line inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
12 months ago
I'd have to go with Option B. Lacking source accountability means you're not getting to the heart of the problem. Throwing more personnel at it (Option A) is just throwing good money after bad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
12 months ago
Hah! Quality circles? What is this, the 1980s? Option C is clearly a joke answer.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
11 months ago
D) Its costs are significant
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
B) It lacks source accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
D) Its costs are significant
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
11 months ago
B) It lacks source accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
11 months ago
A) It requires extensive personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
A) It requires extensive personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dante
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. The costs of end-of-line inspection can be astronomical, especially for larger operations. Who needs that financial headache?
upvoted 0 times
Aaron
11 months ago
Exactly, investing in quality control throughout the production process is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
11 months ago
I agree, the costs can really add up. It's better to focus on preventing defects in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
11 months ago
Option D is the way to go. The costs of end-of-line inspection can be astronomical, especially for larger operations. Who needs that financial headache?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
End-of-line inspection is a band-aid solution. It doesn't address the root causes of quality issues. Option B seems the most relevant to me.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
12 months ago
We need to focus on improving quality at the source to prevent issues in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
That's true, end-of-line inspection doesn't hold the source accountable for quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
Option B) It lacks source accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Weldon
1 year ago
But doesn't end-of-line inspection also fail because it requires extensive personnel to carry out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
I agree with Darrin. Without source accountability, it's hard to prevent defects from happening in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 year ago
I think end-of-line inspection often fails because it lacks source accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel