Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

The demonstrated capacity of equipment in a process flow is $1,200 per day. Due to a malfunction in a feeder line, utilizationof the equipment is reduced by 25% on Day 6. If the efficiency remains unchanged at 110%, what would the output be on Day 6?
C) $900
A) $300
B) $330
D) $990

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-Part-2 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 5
[All CPIM-Part-2 Questions]

The demonstrated capacity of equipment in a process flow is $1,200 per day. Due to a malfunction in a feeder line, utilization

of the equipment is reduced by 25% on Day 6. If the efficiency remains unchanged at 110%, what would the output be on Day 6?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The approved output of the distribution requirements planning (DRP) process is an input to the master production planning (MPS) process.The DRP process determines the quantity and timing of finished goods to be delivered to each distribution center or warehouse to meet customer demand1.The output of the DRP process is a distribution schedule that specifies the planned delivery dates and quantities of products2.The distribution schedule is then used as an input to the MPS process, which determines the quantity and timing of end items to be produced at each manufacturing facility3.The MPS process balances the demand from the distribution schedule with the available capacity and resources of the production system3.The output of the MPS process is a master production schedule that specifies the planned production dates and quantities of end items3.


by Mable at Mar 23, 2025, 10:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-Part-2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Simona
6 months ago
I thought it would be lower than 900, interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
6 months ago
So, if the capacity is $1,200 and it's reduced by 25%, does that mean we multiply by 0.75 first? I hope I got that right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
6 months ago
I think we had a similar question in practice about equipment utilization. If I recall, we had to adjust the daily output based on the percentage reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
Wait, how does efficiency at 110% affect this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
7 months ago
If utilization drops by 25%, that’s 900 output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
7 months ago
The capacity is 1200 per day, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
7 months ago
Totally agree, 900 seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
7 months ago
I believe after calculating the reduced capacity, we then apply the efficiency of 110%. I just hope I remember the math correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
7 months ago
I remember that to find the output, we need to calculate the reduced capacity first. But I'm not sure how to apply the efficiency factor correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
8 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can walk through this. The capacity is $1,200 per day, and the efficiency is 110%, so the normal output is $1,320. Then on Day 6, the utilization is reduced by 25%, so the output should be 75% of the normal output. I think the answer is $990, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
8 months ago
I think I've got it! The key is that the efficiency remains at 110%, so we need to factor that in. The normal output is $1,200 * 1.1 = $1,320. Then with the 25% reduction in utilization, the output on Day 6 would be $1,320 * 0.75 = $990. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. If the utilization is reduced by 25%, shouldn't the output be reduced by 25% as well? That would make the answer $900. I'll have to double-check my work on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
8 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The equipment has a capacity of $1,200 per day, and the efficiency is 110%. So the normal output would be $1,320 per day. Then on Day 6, the utilization is reduced by 25%, which means the output should be 75% of the normal output. So the answer should be $990.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
9 months ago
Okay, let me see. The capacity is reduced by 25%, so that's $300 off the original $1,200. But the efficiency is 110%, so the output should be higher than $900. I'm leaning towards option B, $330.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
9 months ago
I think I've got this. The original capacity is $1,200 per day. With the 25% reduction, that's $900 per day. And since the efficiency is 110%, the output on Day 6 would be $990. I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm not sure I fully understand how to approach this. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and try to break it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
9 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key information is the 25% reduction in utilization on Day 6, and the 110% efficiency. I'll need to calculate the new capacity and then adjust for the efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote this question was feeling pretty clever. But hey, at least they didn't ask us to calculate the circumference of a square!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a classic case of 'the more you know, the more you realize you don't know.' I'm just going to go with my gut and pick C. Hopefully, the curve is in my favor!
upvoted 0 times
Fannie
1 year ago
I agree with you, C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with B just to mix it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
1 year ago
I'm going with D, I think that's the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 year ago
I think C is the right choice too. Let's hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathalie
1 year ago
Wait, wait, wait. If the efficiency is 110%, doesn't that mean the output should be even higher than $990? This question is tripping me up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused. If the utilization is reduced by 25%, doesn't that mean the output would be $900? Why is the answer D?
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
1 year ago
Oh, I see now. Thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
1 year ago
If the efficiency remains unchanged at 110%, the output would actually be $990.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
1 year ago
D) $990
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
C) $900
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 year ago
B) $330
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 year ago
A) $300
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wai
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. If the capacity is $1,200 per day and the utilization is reduced by 25% on Day 6, that means the new capacity is $900. And since the efficiency is 110%, the output should be $990. I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
1 year ago
Great, we solved it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
So, the answer is D, $990.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
Yes, with the efficiency remaining at 110%, the output should be $990.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 year ago
I agree, the new capacity is $900 after the reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is C) $900 as well. It makes sense based on the information given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
1 year ago
I agree with Mari, because if the capacity is reduced by 25%, the output would be 75% of $1,200 which is $900.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) $900.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel