Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

The most appropriate production output reporting method for repetitive manufacturing is:
D) backflush.
A) operation-by-operation.
B) count point.
C) job tickets.

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-Part-2 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 5
[All CPIM-Part-2 Questions]

The most appropriate production output reporting method for repetitive manufacturing is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The most appropriate production output reporting method for repetitive manufacturing is backflush.Repetitive manufacturing is a production system where the same or similar products are produced in large quantities or in a continuous flow1.Backflush is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at the end of the production process, rather than at each operation or stage2. Backflush can simplify and streamline the production output reporting process, as it eliminates the need for tracking and recording each individual transaction or movement of materials and components.Backflush can also reduce the paperwork, errors, and costs associated with production output reporting2.

The other options are not as appropriate as backflush for repetitive manufacturing.Operation-by-operation is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at each operation or stage of the production process3. This method can provide more detailed and accurate information about the production performance and costs, but it can also be more complex and time-consuming, as it requires tracking and recording each individual transaction or movement of materials and components.Count point is a method of reporting output and consumption of materials at selected points or milestones in the production process4. This method can provide a balance between detail and simplicity, but it can also introduce errors or discrepancies, as it requires estimating or extrapolating the output and consumption of materials between the count points.Job tickets are documents that record the time, materials, and costs associated with a specific job or order5. This method can provide more flexibility and customization, but it can also be more suitable for job shop or batch production systems, where different products are produced in small quantities or on demand.


by Myra at Aug 28, 2024, 04:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-Part-2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Amber
9 months ago
Totally agree with count point, it simplifies tracking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure backflush is the best option? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
9 months ago
Operation-by-operation is often used in repetitive settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
10 months ago
I disagree, backflush is more efficient in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
10 months ago
Count point is the way to go for repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
10 months ago
Operation-by-operation sounds like it could work, but I feel like backflush is more efficient for repetitive output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
10 months ago
Count points seem familiar, but I can't recall if they are the best fit for this type of manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question about job tickets, but I feel like that’s more for custom jobs rather than repetitive processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
11 months ago
I think the answer might be backflush since it’s often used in repetitive manufacturing, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is B - "count point." That seems like the most appropriate method for tracking production in a repetitive manufacturing environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
11 months ago
Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I'll need to think through the different options carefully. The wording about "repetitive manufacturing" is throwing me off a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the repetitive nature of the manufacturing process. That suggests the answer is likely related to tracking production at a more granular level, rather than just overall job tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'm going to eliminate the options that don't seem to fit the "repetitive manufacturing" context, then evaluate the remaining choices more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. NFS v4.1 is the latest version, so the Kerberos version should be the latest as well. I'll go with krb5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
2 years ago
I bet the exam writer is just trying to trick us. What if the answer is 'all of the above'? You know they love doing that.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
2 years ago
I think it could be job tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
2 years ago
I'm not sure, maybe it's count point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 years ago
I think the answer is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 years ago
I think backflush is the correct method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 years ago
Maybe it's job tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
2 years ago
I'm not sure, it could also be count point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 years ago
I think the answer is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
2 years ago
I think backflush is the best option, it helps in reducing inventory inaccuracies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 years ago
I prefer count point method, it's simpler and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
2 years ago
I agree with Verlene, operation-by-operation provides more detailed tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 years ago
Backflush, definitely. It's like a magic trick for production reporting - bam, all the numbers just appear! Very convenient.
upvoted 0 times
Wenona
2 years ago
I prefer operation-by-operation, it gives a more detailed view of the production process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 years ago
I agree, backflush is so efficient for repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Operation-by-operation seems like a pretty thorough approach. Maybe I should double-check the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
2 years ago
I think count point could also be a good option for tracking production output in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 years ago
I agree, operation-by-operation provides a detailed breakdown of production output.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 years ago
I think option D is the way to go. Backflush is just so efficient for repetitive manufacturing, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
2 years ago
I think operation-by-operation is more accurate in tracking production output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
2 years ago
Count point reporting can also be useful for monitoring production in repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 years ago
I agree, backflush is definitely the most efficient method for repetitive manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verlene
2 years ago
I think the most appropriate method is operation-by-operation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel