New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CPIM-Part-2 Exam - Topic 4 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-Part-2 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 4
[All CPIM-Part-2 Questions]

When deciding what to report externally regarding sustainability performance, a company should disclose:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When deciding what to report externally regarding sustainability performance, a company should disclose its past results and future strategies. This will help the company to demonstrate its progress, achievements, challenges, and commitments in relation to its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. Disclosing past results and future strategies will also enhance the company's transparency, accountability, and credibility with its stakeholders, such as investors, customers, employees, regulators, and the public.

Disclosing results of poor performance or acceptable performance alone is not sufficient, as it does not provide a complete picture of the company's sustainability performance. Moreover, disclosing only poor performance may damage the company's reputation and trust, while disclosing only acceptable performance may raise doubts about the company's honesty and reliability. Disclosing why current regulations are too costly is irrelevant and inappropriate, as it does not reflect the company's sustainability performance or efforts. It may also imply that the company is not willing or able to comply with the regulations or improve its sustainability practices.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tamala
3 days ago
B is the safest option. No need to disclose poor performance and upset stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
8 days ago
D is the way to go! Regulations are just too expensive, we need to focus on the bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
13 days ago
I think C is the correct answer. A company should be transparent about its past sustainability performance and future plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
18 days ago
I recall a practice question that emphasized the need for comprehensive reporting, which makes me lean towards C again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
24 days ago
I think B makes sense because acceptable performance is still worth reporting, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
29 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like A could be important too. Companies need to acknowledge their shortcomings, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 month ago
I remember we discussed the importance of transparency in reporting, so I think C might be the best choice since it covers both past and future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 month ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I was thinking B might be the best answer, but now I'm not so sure. I'll make sure to carefully review the options again before selecting my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
1 month ago
I feel pretty confident that the correct answer is C. Providing both historical data and future plans is the most informative and responsible way for a company to report on their sustainability efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 months ago
D is definitely not the right answer. That's just trying to make excuses instead of actually reporting on sustainability performance. I'd go with C - it covers the key information that should be disclosed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I was leaning towards B, but C also seems like a good option. I'll need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
2 months ago
I think C is the best answer here. Disclosing past results and future strategies seems like the most comprehensive and transparent approach to sustainability reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel