Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Which of the following effects is likely to occur in a successful Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment implementation?
D) Increased cost of components
A) Increased inventory turns
B) Increased gross revenue
C) Increased cycle time to market

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-MPR exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 4
[All CPIM-MPR Questions]

Which of the following effects is likely to occur in a successful Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment implementation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Vinnie at Dec 08, 2024, 10:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-MPR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reta
9 months ago
I agree with A, but B is a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
9 months ago
Wait, increased costs? That sounds off, isn't it supposed to save money?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
9 months ago
C seems unlikely, we want faster cycles, not longer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
I think B could be true too, more sales from better planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
10 months ago
Definitely A, more inventory turns are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
10 months ago
I feel like increased cost of components might be a trick option. I don't recall it being a focus in our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
10 months ago
Increased cycle time to market seems wrong; I thought CPFR was supposed to speed things up, not slow them down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about increased gross revenue being a possible outcome. It seems logical if we improve our planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
I think increased inventory turns makes sense because better forecasting should reduce excess stock, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
11 months ago
Based on my understanding of CPFR, I think the answer has to be increased inventory turns. By improving demand forecasting and coordination between partners, CPFR should help reduce excess inventory and stockouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options seem a bit mixed - some are positive effects, while others could be negative. I'll have to review my notes on CPFR to figure out the most likely outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
11 months ago
Okay, let me see... CPFR is all about improving demand forecasting and replenishment, right? So I'd guess the answer is increased inventory turns, since that's a key metric for supply chain performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know CPFR is supposed to improve supply chain efficiency, but I'm not certain which specific effect it's most likely to have. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is increased inventory turns, since that's a common benefit of CPFR implementations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
1 year ago
Finally, a CPFR question! I've been studying those supply chain diagrams until my eyes glazed over.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
Increased cost of components? Are you kidding me? CPFR is all about cutting costs through better planning and coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 year ago
Increased cycle time? No way, CPFR is supposed to reduce time-to-market, not the other way around.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 year ago
Agreed, CPFR is all about improving efficiency and reducing lead times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
CPFR should definitely reduce cycle time, not increase it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ira
1 year ago
Increased gross revenue? That's wishful thinking. CPFR is all about optimizing inventory, not boosting top-line sales.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
1 year ago
Increased gross revenue? That's wishful thinking. CPFR is all about optimizing inventory, not boosting top-line sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eloisa
1 year ago
Increased inventory turns? Definitely the correct answer. Streamlined supply chain coordination is the key benefit of CPFR!
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but A) Increased inventory turns makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 year ago
I agree with Natalie. Increased inventory turns would lead to better efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I think A) Increased inventory turns is likely to occur.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel