Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Which of the following effects is likely to occur in a successful Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment implementation?
D) Increased cost of components
A) Increased inventory turns
B) Increased gross revenue
C) Increased cycle time to market

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-MPR exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 4
[All CPIM-MPR Questions]

Which of the following effects is likely to occur in a successful Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment implementation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Vinnie at Dec 08, 2024, 10:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-MPR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reta
7 months ago
I agree with A, but B is a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 months ago
Wait, increased costs? That sounds off, isn't it supposed to save money?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
8 months ago
C seems unlikely, we want faster cycles, not longer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
8 months ago
I think B could be true too, more sales from better planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
8 months ago
Definitely A, more inventory turns are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
8 months ago
I feel like increased cost of components might be a trick option. I don't recall it being a focus in our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
9 months ago
Increased cycle time to market seems wrong; I thought CPFR was supposed to speed things up, not slow them down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about increased gross revenue being a possible outcome. It seems logical if we improve our planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
9 months ago
I think increased inventory turns makes sense because better forecasting should reduce excess stock, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
9 months ago
Based on my understanding of CPFR, I think the answer has to be increased inventory turns. By improving demand forecasting and coordination between partners, CPFR should help reduce excess inventory and stockouts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options seem a bit mixed - some are positive effects, while others could be negative. I'll have to review my notes on CPFR to figure out the most likely outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
Okay, let me see... CPFR is all about improving demand forecasting and replenishment, right? So I'd guess the answer is increased inventory turns, since that's a key metric for supply chain performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know CPFR is supposed to improve supply chain efficiency, but I'm not certain which specific effect it's most likely to have. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is increased inventory turns, since that's a common benefit of CPFR implementations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
1 year ago
Finally, a CPFR question! I've been studying those supply chain diagrams until my eyes glazed over.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tyisha
1 year ago
Increased cost of components? Are you kidding me? CPFR is all about cutting costs through better planning and coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 year ago
Increased cycle time? No way, CPFR is supposed to reduce time-to-market, not the other way around.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 year ago
Agreed, CPFR is all about improving efficiency and reducing lead times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
CPFR should definitely reduce cycle time, not increase it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
1 year ago
D) Increased cost of components
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
C) Increased cycle time to market
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 year ago
B) Increased gross revenue
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ira
1 year ago
Increased gross revenue? That's wishful thinking. CPFR is all about optimizing inventory, not boosting top-line sales.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
1 year ago
Increased gross revenue? That's wishful thinking. CPFR is all about optimizing inventory, not boosting top-line sales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 year ago
A) Increased inventory turns
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eloisa
1 year ago
Increased inventory turns? Definitely the correct answer. Streamlined supply chain coordination is the key benefit of CPFR!
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but A) Increased inventory turns makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 year ago
I agree with Natalie. Increased inventory turns would lead to better efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I think A) Increased inventory turns is likely to occur.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel