Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APICS CPIM-MPR Exam - Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Posted by Sean on Apr 30, 2024 at 09:57 AM

Using a trial and error approach is most effective in which of the following production planning strategies?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CPIM-MPR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
51 comments · newest first
EL
Ellen 10 months ago
Chase strategy allows for flexibility, makes sense!
NA
Nathalie 11 months ago
Wait, really? I thought level production was the way to go!
BR
Brice 11 months ago
Trial and error is key in production planning.
TY
Tyisha 11 months ago
I disagree, I believe D, Mixed is more effective.
TE
Tess 11 months ago
I think it's definitely C, Chase strategy.
DA
Dannie 12 months ago
I vaguely recall that constant strategies are more rigid, so maybe they wouldn't use trial and error as much.
GO
Goldie 12 months ago
I’m torn between level and chase strategies for this one. I feel like both could use trial and error in different ways.
JU
Justine 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think mixed strategies might involve some trial and error too.
TR
Trina 1 year ago
I think trial and error is more suited for the chase strategy, but I'm not completely sure.
LE
Leontine 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the characteristics of each production planning strategy to determine the best answer.
MA
Marge 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The trial and error approach is most effective for the Chase strategy, where you adjust production to meet fluctuating demand. I'll go with that.
MO
Mona 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this. I'll have to review my notes on the different production planning strategies to see which one matches the description in the question.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different production planning strategies to figure out which one is best suited for a trial and error approach.
TA
Tawna 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the server.conf attributes and how they relate to decommissioning a site in an indexer cluster.
GO
Goldie 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to redirect the StoreFront URL to a different web page, so I'll go with option B.
BI
Billy 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the Modigliani and Miller theory carefully to figure out how the cost of equity would be affected.
AZ
Azzie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Adjusting the exposure settings could also help, but I'll have to think about the other options too.
HA
Hannah 1 year ago
I think the MAC address used in FCoE is actually derived from the Fibre Channel ID, but I'm not completely sure which statement is correct.
TW
Twana 1 year ago
Trial and error? Isn't that just the strategy I use for life in general? I'm putting C. Chase down and hoping for the best.
SL
Slyvia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twana
I think it's important to be flexible in production planning. I'll go with C. Chase.
CL
Clarinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twana
I prefer to have a more consistent approach. I'm choosing B. Constant.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twana
I agree, sometimes you just have to try different things to see what works. I'll go with A. Level.
CA
Cary 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twana
I think trial and error can work in many situations. I'm going with D. Mixed.
TI
Tish 1 year ago
I'm going to go with B. Constant. That way, if I mess up, I can just keep trying different constant rates until I find the right one. Easy peasy!
LI
Lindsay 1 year ago
A. Level seems like it would be the least effective for trial and error. I'm going with C. Chase on this one.
CE
Celestina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
Constant might be too rigid for trial and error, I would go with Chase as well.
MA
Marshall 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
I think Mixed could also work well with trial and error.
KR
Kristine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
I agree, Chase seems like the best option for trial and error.
TA
Taryn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
Constant might be too rigid for trial and error.
IR
Ira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
I think Mixed could also work well with trial and error.
CO
Corrie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lindsay
I agree, Chase seems like the best option for trial and error.
MA
Marta 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Could it be D. Mixed? That sounds like it would involve a bit of trial and error to find the right balance.
NE
Nettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
Thanks for confirming! I'll remember that for next time.
KA
Kandis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
Yes, Mixed is the correct answer. It allows for flexibility in adjusting production levels.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
I think you're right. Mixed does involve some trial and error to find the right balance.
RE
Reynalda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
D) Mixed
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
C) Chase
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
B) Constant
HO
Horace 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
Oh, I see. Level production planning strategy does involve a trial and error approach to maintain a consistent production rate.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
Actually, it's not D. Mixed. The most effective production planning strategy that involves trial and error is A) Level.
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
I think you're onto something there. Mixed production planning does involve some trial and error to find the optimal balance.
TH
Therese 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
A) Level
AM
Amie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marta
Yes, you're correct! Mixed production planning strategy involves a combination of different approaches, allowing for some trial and error.
HE
Hector 2 years ago
I prefer constant production planning because it provides stability and predictability in the production process.
MU
Murray 2 years ago
I think the answer is C. Chase. That's the one where you try to match production to demand, right? Seems like trial and error would be the way to go there.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
↳ replying to Murray
It's important to be flexible and adapt quickly in a chase strategy.
BE
Bea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Murray
I agree, it's all about finding the right balance between production and demand.
AZ
Azzie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Murray
Trial and error can definitely be helpful in that situation.
RO
Ronald 1 year ago
↳ replying to Murray
Yes, you're correct! Chase strategy involves adjusting production to meet demand.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
I agree with Carin, mixed production planning allows for flexibility and adjustment through trial and error.
CA
Carin 2 years ago
I think using a trial and error approach is most effective in mixed production planning.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel