MENU
A manufacturer's market is highly dependent upon customers selecting standard options at the time of placing an order. Which of the following manufacturing strategies is best suited to compete in this market?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CPIM-BSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
CE
Celia
10 months ago
Interesting question! I wonder how customer preferences play in.
RE
Reita
11 months ago
I think assemble-to-order could work too, just saying.
JA
Jackie
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure make-to-stock is the best? Seems risky.
HE
Hermila
11 months ago
Totally agree, make-to-stock fits this market perfectly!
ER
Erin
11 months ago
Make-to-stock is usually the way to go for standard options.
OL
Olene
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards "Make-to-stock" as the best strategy, but I keep second-guessing myself about the other options.
WI
Wilda
12 months ago
I feel like "Make-to-order" could be a contender, but it seems less efficient for standard options. I wish I had practiced more questions like this.
MA
Mariann
12 months ago
I remember discussing "Assemble-to-order" in class, which seems like it could work too, but I’m not confident it fits the description perfectly.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I think the answer might be "Make-to-stock" since it allows for quick delivery of standard options, but I'm not entirely sure.
TE
Terry
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B, make-to-order. That strategy allows the manufacturer to produce products based on actual customer orders, which seems well-suited for a market focused on standard options.
RO
Rosalyn
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. A market that's highly dependent on standard options suggests the manufacturer should focus on efficiency and minimizing customization. So I'm thinking either make-to-order or assemble-to-order might be the best approach here.
JA
Jaclyn
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward operations management question. I think the key is to identify the manufacturing strategy that best fits a market with high demand for standard options.
CH
Christiane
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for the given market conditions. I'll have to think it through carefully.
JO
Jolene
1 year ago
Option C looks promising - adjusting that specific property could be the solution. I'll make sure to double-check the exact syntax and value to set.
SH
Shelia
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but wasn't there something about how the Physiological Approach doesn't really cover all the social factors?
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
D) Make-to-stock? More like 'Make-to-get-stuck-with-a-bunch-of-unsold-inventory'! C) Assemble-to-order is the way to go, my friends.
OZ
Ozell
1 year ago
A) Engineer-to-order? More like 'Engineer-to-take-forever-and-cost-a-fortune', am I right? Let's go with C) Assemble-to-order and get this done in a snap!
LE
Lenny
1 year ago
C) Assemble-to-order it is, let's get this done quickly and smoothly!
SA
Samira
1 year ago
A) Engineer-to-order does take a long time and cost a lot, C) Assemble-to-order is definitely the better choice here.
RO
Ronna
1 year ago
D) Make-to-stock might be too risky with standard options, let's stick with C) Assemble-to-order.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
C) Assemble-to-order sounds like the way to go, quick and efficient!
SA
Salena
1 year ago
I'm torn between B) Make-to-order and C) Assemble-to-order. Hmm, maybe I should just flip a coin and hope for the best.
AD
Adaline
1 year ago
Why not consider a mix of both strategies? You can offer standard options with the ability to customize certain features. It's all about finding the right balance.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
If customers are looking for unique products, Make-to-order might be the way to go. But if they prefer some standard options, Assemble-to-order could work better.
BR
Bronwyn
1 year ago
Make-to-order allows for customization while Assemble-to-order offers some level of standardization. It really depends on your customer base.
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
Oh, this is easy! The right answer has got to be C) Assemble-to-order. That way, the manufacturer can quickly put together the exact configuration the customer wants.
TR
Tracie
1 year ago
That's true, it allows for flexibility while still maintaining efficiency in production.
PH
Phyliss
1 year ago
Yeah, with Assemble-to-order, the manufacturer can customize products without starting from scratch.
AD
Adrianna
1 year ago
I think C) Assemble-to-order is the best strategy for this type of market.
AL
Alease
1 year ago
Definitely not D) Make-to-stock, that's way too inflexible for a market that's so dependent on customer preferences. I'm leaning towards C) Assemble-to-order.
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
Make-to-order could work, but it might not be as efficient as Assemble-to-order.
MA
Maurine
1 year ago
Engineer-to-order might be too time-consuming for this market.
LI
Lina
1 year ago
Assemble-to-order seems like a good choice since it allows for some customization.
LA
Lai
1 year ago
I agree, Make-to-stock is definitely not the best option for this market.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
I think B) Make-to-order could also work well, since it allows for more flexibility in meeting customer preferences.
RO
Roy
1 year ago
I agree, C) Assemble-to-order allows for some customization while still maintaining efficiency.
AN
Annamae
1 year ago
I disagree, Make-to-stock would be more cost-effective in this scenario.
TA
Tabetha
2 years ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm thinking either B) Make-to-order or C) Assemble-to-order would be a good fit for a market that relies on standard options.
SU
Sueann
2 years ago
I agree, Assemble-to-order allows for customization while still maintaining efficiency.
DO
Donette
2 years ago
I think the best strategy would be Assemble-to-order.