APICS Exam CPIM-BSP Topic 2 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CPIM-BSP exam

Question #: 88
Topic #: 2

If the quantity ordered equals the quantity required in a time bucket, which of the following lot-sizing rules has been used?

ALot-for-lot

BFixed order quantity

COrder 'N' periods supply

DEconomic order quantity (EOQ)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Leoma at May 17, 2024, 09:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPIM-BSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brittani

16 days ago

Lot-for-lot? More like 'Lot-for-laugh' with some of these other options. This one's a no-brainer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

18 days ago

Fixed order quantity? Sounds like my high school gym locker - always the same size, no matter what I put in it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anna

19 days ago

EOQ? Really? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Lot-for-lot is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

21 days ago

Order 'N' periods supply? Nah, that's not it. This is all about matching the order to the demand, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) Economic order quantity could also be a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

2 months ago

Lot-for-lot, that's the one! Seems like a straightforward question, really.

upvoted 0 times

Adell

9 days ago

Definitely, lot-for-lot helps in minimizing inventory costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

25 days ago

It's a simple and efficient lot-sizing rule to use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

26 days ago

Yes, it's a simple concept to understand.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

1 months ago

Yes, lot-for-lot is used when the quantity ordered equals the quantity required in a time bucket.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

1 months ago

Lot-for-lot, that's the one! Seems like a straightforward question, really.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

1 months ago

Lot-for-lot is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shizue

2 months ago

I agree with Louann, Lot-for-lot makes sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

2 months ago

I think the answer is A) Lot-for-lot.

upvoted 0 times

...