Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

APICS CLTD Exam - Topic 6 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for APICS's CLTD exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 6
[All CLTD Questions]

A company wants to minimize tariff costs while avoiding the need to file for duty drawback. Which of the following practices would best achieve this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lilli at Nov 21, 2025, 03:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLTD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aleta
24 hours ago
A is solid. C-TPAT improves security and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
6 days ago
I agree with B. FTZs allow for tariff deferral.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
11 days ago
D seems risky. FOB terms can lead to unexpected fees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
16 days ago
I feel C could be useful. A good 3PL can optimize shipping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
22 days ago
Definitely FTZs, they’re the best option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
27 days ago
Not sure about C-TPAT being effective for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
2 months ago
I think using a 3PL is a solid choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question about 3PL providers, but I don't recall how they directly impact tariff costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
2 months ago
I feel like shipping by FOB terms could help, but it seems more related to shipping responsibilities than minimizing tariffs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about C-TPAT rules being more about security than cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
I think using foreign/free trade zones (FTZs) might be the best option since they can help reduce tariffs significantly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
2 months ago
C-TPAT? More like C-TPAIN, am I right? FTZs all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
3 months ago
Haha, shipping FOB? That's like the easy way out. Real pros use FTZs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
3 months ago
Using an FTZ is definitely the way to go. Saves a ton on tariffs and paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
3 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice to minimize tariff costs and avoid duty drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards the FTZ option. That seems like it would provide the most direct way to minimize tariffs without needing to worry about duty drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
3 months ago
Using a 3PL provider seems like it could be a smart move here. They'd likely have more expertise in navigating these kinds of trade and logistics challenges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
3 months ago
Shipping FOB could be a good option to avoid tariff costs, but I'm not sure if that alone would be enough to meet the requirements. I'll have to think through the other choices as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
4 months ago
A is interesting too. C-TPAT might help with compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
4 months ago
I think B is the best choice. FTZs can really cut costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 months ago
FTZs can really help with tariff costs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
I'd go with option C. 3PL providers can handle all the logistics and customs stuff for you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
Wait, can FTZs really avoid duty drawbacks? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between C-TPAT and FTZs. I'll need to review those in more detail to understand how they could help with this objective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'd want to look into the pros and cons of each option to see which one best minimizes tariff costs while avoiding duty drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel