Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APEGS NPPE Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for APEGS's NPPE exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All NPPE Questions]

A licensed professional is the Manager of a chemical plant in a northern Canadian town. Internal environmental monitoring shows that effluent was released above permitted levels. The release poses no danger to people but could endanger a small number of fish.

Of the following possibilities, which action should the Manager take first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

NPPE Codes of Ethics and Canadian environmental law require professionals to comply with environmental regulations and report exceedances to regulatory authorities. Protection of the environment and public interest is paramount, regardless of perceived severity.

Option B is the correct first action. Root-cause analysis is important but secondary to regulatory compliance. Options A and C are inappropriate initial steps and do not satisfy reporting obligations.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ernestine
15 days ago
Wait, is it really that serious? Just a few fish?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
20 days ago
I think D is more important for long-term solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
25 days ago
Definitely B, gotta report it to the regulators first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 month ago
A sounds like a bad idea. PR shouldn't be the first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
1 month ago
Surprised this even happened! How did they let it go above limits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
1 month ago
Wait, why not C? Anonymity could protect the manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I think D is more proactive. Root-cause analysis first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
2 months ago
Definitely B! Reporting to regulators is a must.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I was leaning towards contacting public relations first, but now I’m questioning if that’s the right move. It feels like we should prioritize regulatory compliance instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I feel like starting a root-cause analysis is important, but it might be better to report the issue first. I just can’t remember the exact order from my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a similar question where immediate reporting was emphasized. Maybe contacting the hotline could be an option too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 months ago
I think the first step should be to report the issue to the environmental regulators. It seems like the most responsible action.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel