Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Android AND-803 Exam - Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Android's AND-803 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 3
[All AND-803 Questions]

Using the LVL (License Verification Library) in your Android application code requires using one main class: LicenseChecker, and there is no need to using the LicenseCheckerCallback class.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Shad at Aug 05, 2024, 08:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AND-803 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pete
4 months ago
Yup, just LicenseChecker is enough!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
5 months ago
Wait, really? I always used both!
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
5 months ago
Definitely true, no need for that extra class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
5 months ago
I thought you still needed LicenseCheckerCallback?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
That's true, you only need LicenseChecker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
6 months ago
I thought the callback was optional, but now I'm second-guessing myself after reviewing similar questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
6 months ago
I’m pretty certain that the LicenseChecker is the main class, but I feel like the callback is also necessary for proper implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the LicenseChecker, and it mentioned the callback class being important for managing responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
6 months ago
I think we do need to use the LicenseCheckerCallback class to handle the license check results, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
6 months ago
I think I know the answer here. The question is stating that the LicenseCheckerCallback class is not required, so the correct answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
6 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure I follow. The question says there's no need to use the LicenseCheckerCallback class, but the options don't seem to match that. I better double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, so I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll carefully read the question and options to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the LicenseCheckerCallback class, and the correct answer is that it's not needed. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the Rebuild Address Locator tool and the Create Address Locator tool. I'll need to review the descriptions of those tools more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details about IPMP groups before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
11 months ago
Haha, this question is a classic 'trick the developer' kind of thing. I bet the correct answer is the one that sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
11 months ago
Wait, what? No LicenseCheckerCallback class? That can't be right. I'm going to go with the false option B.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
9 months ago
I'm going to stick with option B as well, it just doesn't make sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
9 months ago
I'm not sure about this, but I'll trust you guys and go with option B too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
10 months ago
I think you're right, it does sound strange that there's no LicenseCheckerCallback class. I'll go with option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shannon
11 months ago
This seems too straightforward. There's got to be a catch somewhere. I'll go with option A just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Dino
10 months ago
User 3: I'm not so sure, I'll choose option A just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, let's go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
11 months ago
User 1: I think it's true, no need for LicenseCheckerCallback class.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catarina
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the LicenseCheckerCallback class is required for the LVL. Let me double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I guess we need to review the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) False because LicenseCheckerCallback is also needed for LVL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) True because LicenseChecker is the main class for LVL.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel