MENU
Using the LVL (License Verification Library) in your Android application code requires using one main class: LicenseChecker, and there is no need to using the LicenseCheckerCallback class.
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium AND-803 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
PE
Pete
10 months ago
Yup, just LicenseChecker is enough!
FA
Fanny
11 months ago
Wait, really? I always used both!
IR
Irma
11 months ago
Definitely true, no need for that extra class.
HA
Haley
11 months ago
I thought you still needed LicenseCheckerCallback?
GL
Glory
11 months ago
That's true, you only need LicenseChecker.
RE
Regenia
12 months ago
I thought the callback was optional, but now I'm second-guessing myself after reviewing similar questions.
MA
Mabel
12 months ago
I’m pretty certain that the LicenseChecker is the main class, but I feel like the callback is also necessary for proper implementation.
BI
Billi
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the LicenseChecker, and it mentioned the callback class being important for managing responses.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
I think we do need to use the LicenseCheckerCallback class to handle the license check results, but I'm not completely sure.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
I think I know the answer here. The question is stating that the LicenseCheckerCallback class is not required, so the correct answer must be True.
CE
Cecily
1 year ago
Wait, I'm not sure I follow. The question says there's no need to use the LicenseCheckerCallback class, but the options don't seem to match that. I better double-check my understanding.
DE
Della
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, so I'll need to think it through carefully.
DE
Denna
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll carefully read the question and options to make sure I understand the requirements.
VE
Veta
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the LicenseCheckerCallback class, and the correct answer is that it's not needed. Easy peasy!
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the Rebuild Address Locator tool and the Create Address Locator tool. I'll need to review the descriptions of those tools more closely.
ED
Edelmira
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details about IPMP groups before selecting an answer.
FR
Franchesca
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a classic 'trick the developer' kind of thing. I bet the correct answer is the one that sounds too good to be true.
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
Wait, what? No LicenseCheckerCallback class? That can't be right. I'm going to go with the false option B.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I'm going to stick with option B as well, it just doesn't make sense to me.
AL
Alecia
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this, but I'll trust you guys and go with option B too.
SH
Shala
1 year ago
I think you're right, it does sound strange that there's no LicenseCheckerCallback class. I'll go with option B as well.
SH
Shannon
1 year ago
This seems too straightforward. There's got to be a catch somewhere. I'll go with option A just to be safe.
DI
Dino
1 year ago
User 3: I'm not so sure, I'll choose option A just to be safe.
GR
Grover
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, let's go with option B.
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's true, no need for LicenseCheckerCallback class.
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the LicenseCheckerCallback class is required for the LVL. Let me double-check the documentation.
CA
Cathrine
2 years ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I guess we need to review the documentation to be sure.
YU
Yuette
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) False because LicenseCheckerCallback is also needed for LVL.
CA
Cathrine
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) True because LicenseChecker is the main class for LVL.