MENU
It is not necessary that every application installed on an Android device be signed by the developer before being published.
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium AND-802 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
LE
Leslie
10 months ago
Just another reason to be careful with app downloads!
IR
Ira
11 months ago
It's a bit risky, but it happens.
BE
Bernadine
11 months ago
Wait, really? I thought all apps had to be signed.
AR
Argelia
11 months ago
I disagree, all apps should be signed for security!
RO
Rory
11 months ago
That's true, not every app needs a signature.
NI
Nieves
12 months ago
I recall a practice question about app signing, and it stated that signing is mandatory for distribution. So, I would go with False.
MI
Mickie
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought some apps could be unsigned, especially during development, but not for public release?
XU
Xuan
12 months ago
I feel like we discussed this in class, and it was emphasized that signing is crucial for security. So, I think the answer is False.
CO
Cory
1 year ago
I think I remember that all apps need to be signed, but I'm not entirely sure if there are exceptions.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
True, that's what I recall from the material. Android has a different signing process compared to other platforms.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
Okay, let me reason this out step-by-step. I think the answer is True, but I want to double-check.
RO
Ronald
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The answer is definitely True.
LO
Louann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not completely sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
VI
Viola
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this is true. Android apps don't have to be signed by the developer before publishing.
LO
Lorrie
1 year ago
I don't know, man. I'm just going to sign my app and call it a day. Trying to find loopholes in Android security sounds like a great way to get your app banned.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
Yeah, it's not worth the risk of getting banned.
AA
Aaron
1 year ago
B) False
RA
Raymon
1 year ago
I agree, it's better to play it safe and sign your app.
JI
Jin
1 year ago
A) True
KE
Keva
1 year ago
Wait, does this mean I can just distribute my app without signing it? Sweet, that'll save me a bunch of time! What could possibly go wrong?
LI
Lindsay
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the answer is False. Unless Google has made some major changes to Android that I missed. Anyone else feeling like they're being pranked right now?
SE
Selma
1 year ago
B) False
MI
Mirta
1 year ago
A) True
OD
Odette
1 year ago
Well, if the app is sideloaded and not from the Play Store, I guess it doesn't need to be signed. But who would do that intentionally? Sounds sketchy to me.
CH
Charlesetta
1 year ago
Because every application on an Android device must be signed by the developer before being published.
AR
Ardella
2 years ago
Why do you think so, Charlesetta?
TA
Tawny
2 years ago
I think this is a trick question. Android apps need to be signed, right? Or is there some exception I'm not aware of?
AD
Adelaide
1 year ago
That's correct. However, there are some exceptions where apps can be installed without being signed.
ME
Mel
1 year ago
Yes, Android apps do need to be signed by the developer before being published.
DU
Dusti
1 year ago
B) False
GW
Gwenn
1 year ago
A) True
CH
Charlesetta
2 years ago
I think the answer is False.