Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Planning Association AICP Exam - Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion

ScenarioA pro-development city manager tells you, the planner, that you must provide findings to support a shift in a natural resources boundary in order to accommodate a particular development. What might you do if your findings do not support the shift but there is pressure from the city manager to provide findings that are contrary to your findings?
A) With data on the regulations as well as on the potential long-term consequences of not complying with the regulations, go to the city manager to explain why you cannot approve the project or alter the facts. This information may be sufficient to resolve the situation. You might need to look for creative solutions that will allow for a modified project to move forward and bring these to the city manager. For example, alter the location of development and use the area near the natural resource as an open space amenity. You may need to remove yourself from the situation and refer it to your director. Suppose the city manager goes ahead and approves the project in spite of your findings. Before blowing the whistle, be sure to consult with other planners and other qualified professionals including, if appropriate, the city attorney, to exhaust efforts for reconsideration of the matter. If you should choose to blow the whistle, understand that this may have negative consequences, and so be prepared. Accepting such consequences will be more beneficial to you than behaving unethically. It is very important throughout this process to document everything. Be sure to keep accurate records showing dates, places and content of any conversations, messages and meetings relative to the issue. Remember that a planner must accept the decision of employers, unless the decision is illegal or unethical. Remember that a planner's first obligation is to the public interest, and a development that will have negative environmental consequences is not in the public interest, but a development that will create jobs may be in the public interest (Ethical Principle 2)
B) With data on the regulations as well as on the potential long-term consequences of not complying with the regulations, go to the city manager to explain why you cannot approve the project or alter the facts. This information may be sufficient to resolve the situation. You might need to look for creative solutions that will allow for a modified project to move forward and bring these to the city manager. For example, alter the location of development and use the area near the natural resource as an open space amenity. You may need to remove yourself from the situation and refer it to your director. Suppose the city manager goes ahead and approves the project in spite of your findings. Accepting such consequences will be more beneficial to you than behaving unethically. It is very important throughout this process to document everything. Be sure to keep accurate records showing dates, places and content of any conversations, messages and meetings relative to the issue. Remember that a planner must accept the decision of employers, unless the decision is illegal or unethical. Remember that a planner's first obligation is to the public interest, and a development that will have negative environmental consequences is not in the public interest, but a development that will create jobs may be in the public interest (Ethical Principle 2)

American Planning Association AICP Exam - Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 7
[All AICP Questions]

Scenario

A pro-development city manager tells you, the planner, that you must provide findings to support a shift in a natural resources boundary in order to accommodate a particular development. What might you do if your findings do not support the shift but there is pressure from the city manager to provide findings that are contrary to your findings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tyisha
8 months ago
But what if the development creates jobs? Isn’t that important too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
8 months ago
Surprised this is even a question! Ethics should be a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
9 months ago
Really? I doubt the city manager will listen to reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
9 months ago
Totally agree! Can't compromise on environmental issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
9 months ago
Gotta stick to the facts, right? Ethics first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
9 months ago
I recall a case study where a planner had to find creative solutions to satisfy both the city and environmental concerns. I wonder if suggesting alternative project locations could be a viable strategy here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
9 months ago
I’m worried about the potential fallout if I blow the whistle. I remember discussing the importance of consulting with other professionals first, but what if they don’t agree with me?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to balance ethical obligations with pressure from superiors. It’s tricky, but I feel like presenting data on long-term consequences could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
9 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about how to approach the city manager if my findings don't support the shift. I remember something about documenting everything, but what if they still push for it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards Shield, since that sounds like it could be a Salesforce product focused on security and data protection. But I'll double-check the descriptions just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
9 months ago
Completing the test? I don't know, that doesn't seem right to me. The instructor's job is to facilitate the test, not just finish it no matter what. Safety and accuracy seem like the key things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the specific steps here. I'll need to double-check the instructions and make sure I'm adjusting the inventory correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
10 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to review the Wireshark data closely to see the patterns of the traffic and determine the specific threat. I don't want to rush into an answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel