MENU
Which of the following would best represent the annual success of a planning department's work program?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium AICP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
AS
Ashlyn
7 months ago
A is good, but it doesn't show quality. B is stronger.
BA
Barney
7 months ago
I lean towards B too. Achieving benchmarks indicates effectiveness.
CH
Chauncey
8 months ago
D is interesting. Budget returns reflect financial health.
GL
Glendora
8 months ago
C makes sense. Time efficiency is crucial for success.
EM
Emelda
8 months ago
Totally agree with B! Achieving benchmarks is key!
KA
Kaycee
8 months ago
D? Really? That doesn't reflect success in planning at all!
SA
Sanjuana
8 months ago
C sounds good, but how do we measure that accurately?
MA
Malcom
9 months ago
A is important too, but it doesn't tell the whole story.
DE
Deeann
9 months ago
B) Gotta hit those benchmarks, baby! That's how you know the planning department is on point.
LA
Lashawna
9 months ago
A) Number of applications processed in a year doesn't really capture the quality of their work.
ER
Eric
9 months ago
C) Average amount of time reduced in accomplishing key planning initiatives is a great way to show their efficiency.
EM
Emelda
9 months ago
B) Percentage of benchmarks achieved in a year is the best metric to measure the planning department's success.
FI
Filiberto
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll have to think it through more carefully, but B) or C) seem like the strongest options to me.
JE
Jessenia
10 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Benchmarks show real progress.
MI
Mirta
10 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Benchmarks show real progress.
GO
Goldie
10 months ago
I prefer A. More applications mean more work done.
EL
Elliott
10 months ago
D) Percentage of annual budget returned to the general fund? What is this, a magic trick?
VA
Vashti
11 months ago
D) Percentage of annual budget returned to the general fund doesn't seem like the best choice. That's more about cost-saving than program success.
KI
Kirk
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards A) Number of applications processed in a year. That seems like a straightforward way to quantify the department's workload and output.
JO
Jospeh
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. C) Average amount of time reduced in accomplishing key planning initiatives could also be a good metric to show efficiency and productivity.
DO
Dominga
11 months ago
I think B) Percentage of benchmarks achieved in a year would be the best representation. It directly measures the success of the planning department's work program.
MI
Misty
6 months ago
C could be key too. Time saved means efficiency!
AL
Alex
6 months ago
But what about A? Processing more applications is also important.
DO
Doug
7 months ago
True, benchmarks reflect actual goals met.
MA
Mattie
10 months ago
I agree, B is a solid choice. It shows real progress.
KI
Kimberlie
12 months ago
I feel like D might not directly reflect the success of the planning department's work, but it could be relevant in a broader context.
JO
Joni
12 months ago
I think C could be important too, especially if it shows efficiency improvements over time.
JO
Joesph
12 months ago
I’m not sure if just counting applications processed gives a full picture, though. It seems too simplistic.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
I remember discussing how benchmarks can really show effectiveness, so I might lean towards B.