Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Planning Association Exam AICP Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All AICP Questions]

What case did Alfred Bettman argue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Keneth
15 hours ago
Okay, let's see... Alfred Bettman, city planning... *snaps fingers* Got it! It's gotta be South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel. He was a big advocate for fair housing, if I remember correctly. *laughs* Man, I hope this isn't one of those 'name the case where the defendant won' kind of deals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
2 days ago
Hold up, wasn't Alfred Bettman the guy who literally wrote the book on city planning? If that's the case, my money's on Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo. That's gotta be it, right? *chuckles* Unless this is some kind of trick question...
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
5 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Let's look it up to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
5 days ago
Hmm, Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. sounds familiar, but I feel like I've heard the name Alfred Bettman before. Is that the one where he argued for more inclusive housing policies? Better double-check that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
8 days ago
I believe it was actually Fasano v Board of Co. Commissioners of Washington Co.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
9 days ago
I'm pretty sure it was Village of Euclid v Ambler Realty Co. That landmark case established the legality of zoning laws, which is definitely something an urban planning exam would cover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
14 days ago
I think Alfred Bettman argued in South Burlington County NAACP v Township of Mount Laurel.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel