New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Planning Association AICP Exam - Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Planning Association's AICP exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 2
[All AICP Questions]

Scenario

An oil company is interested in building a refinery on several thousand acres of waterfront property that the company owns. The general plan classifies this area as recreational and residential. The oil company files a re-zoning application to change this area to a heavy industrial classification. The planning director opposes the rezoning amendment stating that the scenic area is a valuable natural resource. Assume that the planning agency acted legally in all respects (proper notice, etc.). However, the county commissioners approve the amendment.

A group of residents who live near the proposed refinery site take the case to court and subpoena the planning director to testify. The planning director provides some information to the citizens' group as they prepare their case and also testifies truthfully in court about the value of the property to the community. Under the AICP Code of Ethics, all the following are true about the behavior of the planning director EXCEPT:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

See Ethical Principle 1, Rules of Conduct 1 and 25. Members of AICP must comply with the law.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Margery
4 months ago
The director definitely served the public interest by speaking up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
4 months ago
Isn't it questionable for the director to testify against their employer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
4 months ago
Wow, I can't believe the county commissioners approved that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
I disagree, the director should follow the employer's decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
4 months ago
The planning director was right to protect the environment!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
This scenario reminds me of a similar practice question we had about planners balancing public interest and employer directives. I wonder if that applies here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
5 months ago
I think the director's concern for the environment aligns with ethical responsibilities, but I’m not clear if testifying in court is a breach of ethics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the Code of Ethics might have some guidelines about accepting employer decisions. Could that be why option B seems questionable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of planners serving the public interest, so I think the director's actions in providing information were justified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. Setting the "is Extensible" property to false and creating a new enum for MUV should do the trick. I'm pretty confident this solution meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the company's policies and the potential consequences of each action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
5 months ago
I've got this! Enabling snapshots, deploying services securely, and using VPNs for remote access - that should cover the main points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
5 months ago
I think entity services are designed first because they focus on the core business logic, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure, but I'm going to give it my best shot. Eliminating the options that don't seem to fit the description is a good place to start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 months ago
I've got a hunch on this one. I'm leaning towards option C, but I'll double-check my understanding to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel