I think the key is whether the branch is actually being shut down permanently or just relocated. Moving 850 feet seems like more of a relocation than a closure, so D doesn't seem to fit the bill.
Option A is an interesting one - a temporary closure due to hurricane damage. I wonder if that's considered a 'closing' that requires a notice, or if it's more of an emergency situation where the rules are different.
Hah, imagine if the bank just moved the branch 850 feet down the street! Does that really count as 'closing' a branch? Shouldn't they just put up a sign saying 'We've moved to the building next door'?
I'd go with C - when a bank takes over a failed institution, the FDIC usually requires them to keep the branches open for a certain period. Closing one of those would definitely need a notice.
Option B seems the most straightforward - the bank is closing a branch due to lack of business, so they would need to post a notice. The other options don't seem to clearly require a notice.
C) A bank decides not to exercise its option to purchase a branch it has been temporarily running for the FDIC as a part of a purchase of a failed institution.
Stephaine
14 days agoWillodean
18 days agoCarrol
3 days agoHeike
25 days agoPrecious
8 days agoGilbert
1 months agoGilberto
19 days agoEzekiel
2 months agoJacinta
2 months agoEmilio
2 months agoTish
26 days agoVirgie
1 months agoShay
1 months agoLisha
1 months agoDelsie
2 months ago