Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

American Bankers Association CRCM Exam - Topic 4 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for American Bankers Association's CRCM exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 4
[All CRCM Questions]

FA presents cash to the bank and seeks to wire it to his spouse, RA, in Cub A . The OFAC list identifies RA as a specially designated national. Under OFAC Regulations, what should the bank do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Felix
4 months ago
But what if the spouse isn't involved in anything illegal?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
5 months ago
Definitely A. Can't risk penalties from OFAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
5 months ago
Wait, can they really just block it like that? Seems harsh!
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
5 months ago
Totally agree, blocking is the only option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
5 months ago
The bank has to block the transfer. OFAC rules are strict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
5 months ago
I think the bank can only conduct the transfer if Cuba isn’t blocked, but I’m not confident about that. It’s tricky with all the regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the bank should notify OFAC or just block the transfer. I feel like I’ve seen both scenarios in practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
I remember a practice question about blocking transactions involving designated nationals. It seems like option A is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
6 months ago
I think the bank has to block the transfer since RA is on the OFAC list, but I'm not entirely sure if there are exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
6 months ago
I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding. Let me quickly review the definitions of these terms to make sure I'm selecting the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
6 months ago
I feel like we have tackled similar questions before; suspending the accounts in the Sponsor Portal seems like a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about an annotation that allows a request to be executed with another Principal's identity. I'm pretty sure option A is wrong, since it says it's not possible. Options C and D don't seem relevant. So I'm going to go with B, @UseIdentity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
6 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. I'll just go with my gut instinct on this one and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel