Hmm, options B and D both sound like they're on the money. Lenders need clear policies and compensating factors when dealing with high-risk borrowers. No room for cowboys in subprime lending!
I'm thinking option A is the way to go. Debt-to-income ratios are a critical underwriting standard for subprime mortgages. Lenders need to keep a close eye on that metric.
I'll go with option D. Layering multiple risk features requires robust compensating factors to support the underwriting decision. Gotta be careful with subprime lending, folks.
Wow, option C really hits the nail on the head. Stated income loans to subprime borrowers should only be made with strong mitigating factors. No room for risky lending practices here!
Option B seems to cover the key underwriting standards for subprime lending. Clear policies on risk-layering features are crucial to manage the risks involved.
Thad
27 days agoGianna
28 days agoFatima
10 days agoElenore
1 months agoFabiola
4 days agoSusy
1 months agoCeleste
2 months agoGerald
2 months agoBarrie
16 days agoBarrie
28 days agoSherill
1 months agoLamar
1 months agoSherill
1 months agoRosalind
1 months agoAlecia
1 months agoElouise
1 months agoRyan
2 months agoAlica
2 months ago