Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 9 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 9
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A company is planning to host its stateful web-based applications on AWS A SysOps administrator is using an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances The web applications will run 24 hours a day 7 days a week throughout the year The company must be able to change the instance type within the same instance family later in the year based on the traffic and usage patterns

Which EC2 instance purchasing option will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Nu at Mar 23, 2023, 04:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SOA-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Malika
1 months ago
I bet the SysOps admin is wishing they had a crystal ball to predict the future traffic patterns. Talk about a tough call!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
1 months ago
Standard Reserved Instances? Nah, that's too inflexible. I'd rather have the ability to change things up as needed. This is AWS, not your grandma's server farm!
upvoted 0 times
Jenise
11 days ago
Yeah, Standard Reserved Instances might not be the best fit for this dynamic environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
13 days ago
Spot Instances could also be a cost-effective choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
On-Demand Instances would be the best option for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salena
2 months ago
Spot instances? Really? I don't think the company wants to risk their mission-critical apps going down whenever AWS decides to reclaim those instances.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
23 days ago
C: Spot instances could be risky for mission-critical applications, as you mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
24 days ago
B: On-Demand instances might be more expensive in the long run for 24/7 usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 months ago
A: Convertible Reserved Instances would be the best option for flexibility in changing instance types later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynsey
2 months ago
On-Demand instances might be the simplest option, but I doubt they'll be the most cost-effective for 24/7 operation. Gotta look at the bigger picture here.
upvoted 0 times
Cyndy
4 days ago
C: Spot instances could be a cost-effective option if the workload is flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
18 days ago
B: On-Demand instances are convenient, but might not be the most cost-effective for 24/7 operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
1 months ago
A: I think Convertible Reserved Instances could be the way to go for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roxane
2 months ago
Convertible Reserved Instances seem like the way to go. The ability to change instance types without penalty is crucial for handling the changing traffic patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
But with Convertible Reserved Instances, we can change the instance type later based on traffic patterns, which can save us money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe On-Demand instances would be more cost-effective in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
I think the best option would be Convertible Reserved Instances.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel