Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam SOA-C02 Topic 10 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SOA-C02 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 10
[All SOA-C02 Questions]

A SysOps administrator is investigating a company's web application for performance problems The application runs on Amazon EC2 instances that are in an Auto Scaling group. The application receives large traffic increases at random times throughout the day. During periods of rapid traffic increases, the Auto Scaling group is not adding capacity fast enough. As a result, users are experiencing poor performance.

The company wants to minimize costs without adversely affecting the user experience when web traffic surges quickly. The company needs a solution that adds more capacity to me Auto Scaling group for larger traffic increases than for smaller traffic increases.

How should the SysOps administrator configure the Auto Scaling group to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Increasing DB Instance Size:

Increasing the instance size provides more CPU and memory resources, which can help handle higher loads.

Steps:

Go to the AWS Management Console.

Navigate to RDS and select the DB instance.

Modify the instance to increase its size.

Apply the changes during the next maintenance window or immediately if it is a critical issue.

Monitoring Performance:

After resizing, monitor the instance during the next report run to ensure that it handles the load effectively.


by Mozelle at Sep 15, 2024, 01:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SOA-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marica
17 days ago
Wait, so we're not just going to throw a bunch of EC2 instances at the problem and hope for the best? This is way more nuanced than I expected. I'm impressed, SysOps admins have a tough job!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
23 days ago
I can already hear the CFO groaning about the costs if we just crank up the capacity whenever the load gets heavy. B seems like the best balance between performance and cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 months ago
D sounds a bit convoluted, adjusting the max instances after each scaling event seems like it could get messy. I think I'll stick with the more straightforward options like B or C.
upvoted 0 times
Amira
1 days ago
But what about C? It also allows for larger adjustments in capacity during heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
28 days ago
Yeah, B sounds like a good option. It allows for larger adjustments in capacity during heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
29 days ago
I agree, D does seem a bit complicated. I think B might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ollie
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards C, the target tracking scaling policy seems like it could automatically scale up the capacity when the system is under heavy load. That could be a good hands-off solution.
upvoted 0 times
Viki
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good hands-off solution for handling traffic surges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 months ago
User 1: I think C could work, it automatically adjusts capacity based on target tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teddy
2 months ago
Option B looks promising, the step scaling policy could help adjust capacity based on the load. I'll need to do some research on how to configure that properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
That makes sense too, target tracking scaling policy could be more efficient in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C because target tracking scaling policy adjusts capacity based on a target metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
I think the answer is B because step scaling policy allows for larger adjustments in capacity during heavy load.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel