Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SCS-C03 Exam - Topic 6 Question 9 Discussion

Posted by Salena on May 03, 2026 at 08:05 PM

A company runs several applications on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS). The company needs a solution to detect any Kubernetes security risks by monitoring Amazon EKS audit logs in addition to operating system, networking, and file events. The solution must send email alerts for any identified risks to a mailing list that is associated with a security team.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Suggested Answer: C

Option C best meets the requirements because Amazon GuardDuty provides Kubernetes-focused threat detection for Amazon EKS by analyzingEKS control plane audit logs(EKS Protection) and combining that signal withruntime telemetryfrom the worker nodes (Runtime Monitoring). EKS audit logs capture Kubernetes API activity and authorization decisions, allowing GuardDuty to detect suspicious cluster actions such as unusual API calls, unexpected access patterns, or indicators of compromise within the cluster. Runtime Monitoring extends coverage tooperating system/process activity, network connections, and file activityon the nodes, which directly aligns with the need to monitor OS, networking, and file events in addition to audit logs.

For notifications, GuardDuty generatesfindingsthat can be delivered throughAmazon EventBridgerules. EventBridge can route relevant GuardDuty findings to anAmazon SNS topic, and SNS can sendemail alertsto the security team by subscribing the team's mailing list to the topic. This approach is fully managed, near real time, and avoids building custom log-parsing pipelines while still providing actionable alerts based on GuardDuty's curated EKS threat detections.


Get Premium SCS-C03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
JI
Jian Kobayashi 10 days ago
C makes the most sense here because the tricky part is correlating control-plane audit logs with runtime telemetry and routing alerts to a mailing list.
AL
Alva 15 days ago
Exactly, A balances functionality and ease of use.
KE
Keith 21 days ago
Right, simplicity matters. A keeps it clean and effective.
KA
Kara 26 days ago
D is straightforward, but I worry about the SSM Agent overhead.
TI
Tish 1 month ago
I like B for its focus on container scanning. But it feels a bit complex.
SA
Sarina 1 month ago
True, but A integrates better with EventBridge for alerts.
AL
Alva 1 month ago
Option C looks good too. GuardDuty has strong monitoring capabilities.
SA
Sarina 2 months ago
I agree, A seems comprehensive. SNS for alerts is a smart move.
KE
Keith 2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Security Hub covers EKS controls well.
AL
Alita 2 months ago
I prefer A for its simplicity and direct alerting.
VI
Vicky 2 months ago
D is too manual with SSM Agent. A or C is more automated.
DE
Devora 2 months ago
B is solid, but it seems more complex than A.
EL
Elfrieda 2 months ago
I feel like B is overlooked. Inspector and Detective can provide deep insights.
MA
Marta 3 months ago
True, but A integrates better with EventBridge for alerts.
WE
Weldon 3 months ago
Option C looks good too. GuardDuty is effective for threat detection.
LA
Laurel 3 months ago
I agree, A covers EKS controls well. Alerts to SNS are smart.
LI
Lisbeth 3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Security Hub is comprehensive.
DE
Devora 3 months ago
I agree, A is the most comprehensive solution here!
BR
Brett 3 months ago
Wait, can GuardDuty really handle EKS logs effectively?
MA
Mariann 4 months ago
D seems a bit outdated with the SSM Agent requirement.
CA
Cassi 4 months ago
I think C is better since GuardDuty is specifically for security.
MY
Myrtie 4 months ago
Option A sounds solid with Security Hub and SNS integration.
KA
Katheryn 4 months ago
I vaguely remember something about CloudWatch and alarms in option D, but I'm not clear on how effective that would be for real-time alerts on security risks.
TA
Tamera 6 months ago
I feel like option C could be a good choice since GuardDuty is designed for security monitoring, but I can't recall if it directly supports EKS audit logs.
CO
Coletta 6 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar because we practiced using EventBridge with Security Hub, but I'm a bit confused about how it handles EKS specifically.
TI
Tiera 6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using Amazon SNS for alerting, but I'm not sure which option integrates best with EKS audit logs.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel