Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon SCS-C02 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

A company is storing data in Amazon S3 Glacier. A security engineer implemented a new vault lock policy for 10 TB of data and called the initiate-vault-lock operation 12 hours ago. The audit team identified a typo in the policy that is allowing unintended access to the vault.What is the MOST cost-effective way to correct this error?
A) Call the abort-vault-lock operation. Update the policy. Call the initiate-vault-lock operation again.
B) Copy the vault data to a new S3 bucket. Delete the vault. Create a new vault with the data.
C) Update the policy to keep the vault lock in place
D) Update the policy. Call the initiate-vault-lock operation again to apply the new policy.

Amazon SCS-C02 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SCS-C02 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All SCS-C02 Questions]

A company is storing data in Amazon S3 Glacier. A security engineer implemented a new vault lock policy for 10 TB of data and called the initiate-vault-lock operation 12 hours ago. The audit team identified a typo in the policy that is allowing unintended access to the vault.

What is the MOST cost-effective way to correct this error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The most cost-effective way to correct a typo in a vault lock policy during the 24-hour initiation period is to call the abort-vault-lock operation. This action stops the vault lock process, allowing the security engineer to correct the policy and re-initiate the vault lock with the corrected policy. This approach avoids the need for data transfer or creating a new vault, thus minimizing costs and operational overhead.


by Agustin at Jul 18, 2024, 09:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCS-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Royal
6 months ago
Definitely going with D, it’s straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
6 months ago
Updating the policy while keeping the lock sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
7 months ago
Surprised they didn't catch that typo sooner!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
7 months ago
I disagree, B would be way too costly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
7 months ago
Option A seems like the best move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m worried about the costs involved with aborting and re-initiating the lock.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
7 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to deal with vault policies. I think updating the policy while keeping the lock might be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
8 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like option D could be risky since the lock is already in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
8 months ago
I remember something about the vault lock process being pretty strict, so I think aborting it might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
8 months ago
I've dealt with this type of situation before. I think option D is the way to go - update the policy and re-initiate the vault lock.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. I'll need to review the AWS documentation to make sure I understand the differences between the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
8 months ago
Ugh, I hate dealing with these Glacier vault lock issues. I think I'll go with option A - abort the lock, update the policy, and start over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the most cost-effective way is to update the policy and then initiate the vault lock again. But I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the cost implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of elements to consider, like customer segments, value propositions, and revenue streams. I'll need to carefully read through the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about how to execute the changeOption function after the user chooses an option in the select menu. I think the answer is probably A, since that's the only option that directly modifies the select element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key characteristics of Nokia's non-stop routing implementation before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
2 years ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? That's just sweeping the problem under the rug. Nah, D is definitely the way to go, clean and simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 years ago
Haha, someone's got some explaining to do for that typo! I'd go with D, gotta love those AWS CLI commands, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
2 years ago
This is a tricky one, but I reckon D is the most efficient way to fix the issue. Calling abort-vault-lock and then re-initiating it just seems like a waste of time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
Rosita
2 years ago
Updating the policy and calling the initiate-vault-lock operation again makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
2 years ago
I would go with option D as well, it's the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
2 years ago
Yeah, I think updating the policy and reapplying it is the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems like the most efficient way to correct the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
2 years ago
Option B sounds like a lot of work and unnecessary data transfer. I'd rather go with the simpler solution of just updating the policy and reapplying it.
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
2 years ago
B: Yeah, updating the policy and reapplying it is definitely the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
2 years ago
A: I agree, option D seems like the most efficient way to correct the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 years ago
I see your point, Vincent. However, updating the policy and reapplying the vault lock might be quicker and more efficient in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Updating the policy and calling the initiate-vault-lock operation again is the most cost-effective approach, without having to copy all the data or delete the vault.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
2 years ago
Updating the policy and reapplying it sounds like the simplest solution in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 years ago
Yeah, it's the most cost-effective way to correct the error without causing too much disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
2 years ago
But wouldn't copying the data to a new bucket and creating a new vault be safer in case the typo caused any security issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 years ago
I agree with Karina, aborting the vault lock and updating the policy seems like the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel