Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon Exam SAP-C02 Topic 7 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 7
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A financial services company loaded millions of historical stock trades into an Amazon DynamoDB table. The table uses on-demand capacity mode. Once each day at midnight, a few million new records are loaded into the table. Application read activity against the table happens in bursts throughout the day. and a limited set of keys are repeatedly looked up. The company needs to reduce costs associated with DynamoDB.

Which strategy should a solutions architect recommend to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

it will use the ALB to handle the unpredictable bursts of traffic and route it to the SQS queue. The SQS queue will act as a buffer to store incoming data temporarily and the container running in Amazon ECS with the Fargate launch type will process messages in the queue. This approach will ensure that all data is processed and prevent data loss.


by Ceola at Apr 22, 2023, 08:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Remedios
1 months ago
D looks like the full package - DAX, provisioned capacity, and auto-scaling. It's like a Swiss Army knife for this DynamoDB problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
1 months ago
C is tempting, but I don't think provisioned capacity is the answer. Gotta take advantage of those DynamoDB features to optimize performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 months ago
I'm going with B. DAX and auto-scaling sounds like the way to go here. Beats having to manually provision capacity and worry about those pesky Savings Plans.
upvoted 0 times
Wendell
3 days ago
I'm leaning towards B as well. DAX and auto-scaling seem like a good combination to reduce costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
8 days ago
Yeah, I think B is the most cost-effective choice here. No need to worry about manual capacity provisioning with auto-scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
11 days ago
I agree, B does seem like the best option. DAX can definitely help with reducing costs and auto-scaling is convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
2 months ago
Wait, so we need to reduce costs, but they're loading in millions of records daily? That's like trying to save money on your electricity bill while running a Bitcoin mining operation out of your basement!
upvoted 0 times
Alishia
3 days ago
C: D) Deploy DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX). Use provisioned capacity mode. Configure DynamoDB auto scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
14 days ago
B: That sounds like a good plan to optimize costs and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
A: B) Deploy DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX). Configure DynamoDB auto scaling. Purchase Savings Plans in Cost Explorer
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Provisioned capacity may not be cost-effective for this scenario with fluctuating read activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
2 months ago
I agree with Tom. Using DAX and auto scaling can optimize costs while ensuring performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. DAX can help with read activity bursts and auto scaling can adjust capacity based on demand.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel